It's interesting that all the threads on this site start off with some interesting points and discussion, but then they always deteriorate into childish comments as various members start to insult each other and argue over trivial, non-related things.

From now on I shall just read the first two pages of any thread and ignore the rest.

Do you think that they might be troubled to pay a bit more then?

Ask Tigs? One or two of them might have to let the assistant chauffeur or the under-parlourmaid go though, so that would add to the unemployment in the district.

Well you see it is simple. Unless you toe the party line on here you get a pile of abuse.

We've got to get it from somewhere Adey! Let's face it, the government has given Jack all to the Bradford city region (again) in favour of Leeds ( déjà vu, anyone?) so we'll just have to go to the wealthier bits with the begging bowl.......

Soz Tigz....

Or a squadron of tanks...?





The good folk of Bradford really seem to lack streetwiseness (if that is a word?) though? They go and elect a Tory council when the Labour Murdoch-worshippers are in - so they get jack shìt from HMG - then go and elect a Labour council when the Tory Murdoch-worshippers get in - so again get jack shìt from HMG. Good plan

Oh aye, this democracy lark may be the best system there is but it has its imperfections. Not sure Bradford is the [ionly[/i place like that though, it seems to happen a lot. If you don't like the government the first chance to register your dislike is inevitably the local election......so you kick the council out. Not sure it's very strategic, more a case of the knee jerking. Maybe we should vote in favour of this Mayor bloke (or blokess) and choose one who is/was a member of the Bullingdon club........we might even get a new stadium if he has a word with his chums Dave and George

Versus Salford, Hudds away and Cas- "players not good enough" "shocking performance" "The following players should go......"

36-0 V Hudds at home "Why don't they play like this every week?"

Can they win?

Too busy bollocking the kids in front of you swearing all way through the academy game, (my 2 year old son was at his first game otherwise it wouldn't have bothered me as much) then the wife informing me at half time the lads that I'd bollocked where on the pitch being inducted into the academy team!

Quality











(not the swearing mind).

We consier it our Corporate Social Responsibility - a bit like sponsoring a third world family.

Classic

..except
(a) you don't have a choice an
(b) it's a sh:tload more than £3 a month

This result was brilliant for us in 2 ways.

1) Nilling some body is great confidence for the next game we need coming upto the mighty wire, but if we can nilled hudds, why carnt we beat wire?

2) hudds will be very pi$$ed off with that result and hopefully they will go out nextweeek end and hammer hull which is also just what we need.

Not sure how the Bulls played today? but it does back up the fact that as good as the Bulls were against the Giants, the Giants were shocking and I did say best to judge if Bradford have improved after the Wire game.

Doesn't prove a thing. We're capable of being utterly awful within a week of a really good performance and have perfected this inconsistency to a fine art.

Ok that's fine then was just asking.

Write this down someplace. May even be signature material. IMO Flyingprop makes a fair point.

Feel the need to bring this back again. The pile of abuse RTB got for being completely spot on. It seems this board has form for that sort of thing.....

False dichotomy. Perfectly possible to both enjoy the Huddersfield win and be aware that it may well be a false dawn. And most on here managed that.

Most????? How many RAB members contributed to the thread? Not most......

And plenty slated him. He was right.

The OTT age over the Huddersfield game was laughable. RTB was right.

I can't remember anyone claiming we were suddenly a great team and it being the start of a new era. Just that perhaps we should just enjoy the performance on that particular day and leave the inquest as to why we can't do it consistently for another day or another thread.

A quick re-read of this thread will show you that Eddie's summary of it is rather inaccurate.

The only inaccuracy is your "most on here" comment.