Wow you really are an aggressive one, I must have really got under your skin whilst pointing out everything you had said was incorrect.

Feel free to stop by and embarrass yourself any time.

Almost three hours.

Crookes got put on his a rse and he didn't like it.
What's more worrying is if rumours are true we've signed him.
Ran around like a headless chicken, I've seen better defensive play's at under 16's level.

Anyway good news about the takeover, in my opinion SL needs a strong Bradford side.

Sporting Life says.."Seymour get's a caution"....

Some common sense shown by the disciplinary panel for a change - must admit I wouldn't have been surprised to see a ban handed out. Can we all move on now?

Got to love the FC fans slagging off a player based on one performance, a player who is not long back from injury and playing in a team that were completely outplayed for 75 minutes. Probably the same fans that said Lynch was overrated and past it when he played for the bulls, yet now rave about him.

From SL website. Why not penalty sufficient? Must have seen something in the 'spear tackle' for a caution.

Maybe they saw how (as proven on the pictures) he DID have hold of Crookes' legs and Crookes DIDNT land 'flat' on his back.

Can't believe it can still be denied!

The whole reaction to this incident is a sad reflection of the OTT hysteria plaguing our sport.

Possibly the same fans that chucked money in your bucket collection at the KC as well. Who knows ?

Correct on-field and disciplinary decisions were taken in this case for both players which makes a change.

And the award for non sequitur of the week goes to:





Now, you are talking sense. Right call (although fortunate for Thaler as I don't think he saw it)

short memories from certain bulls fanbs, completely embarrasing to be fair...lets be honest, you was quick to chuck the cash around yourselves afew years ago, when you was winning everything, now your skint, get over it..if it wasnt for the help of the wider league community, youd be dead and buried already.....

This thread is confusing me now.

So, three days later you're still going on about it. I told you that you were outraged and you clearly are.

I should expect nothing else from a female though, says one thing, means another. Unfortunately I've been married long enough to realise that you will never own up to what is obvious for all to see.

Did it go on report if so we should find out later if anything comes of it, then we cna concentrate on the CAtalan matach

[urlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?4027[/url

Just worth a warning. In the language of the RFL I'd call it a careless tackle, since the onus is on the tackler to maintain the safety of the player being tacked which he clearly didn't.

Quality.

I would have hoped playing against his future employers he may have wanted to show us why we've signed him.

Lynch has always being a top pro, so stop throwing your dummy on the floor.

By the way can I have that 30 quid back please, that was the money I gave to your club in it's hour of need.

And what does your husband think of you love?

It's in the drawer where you left it.

It appears that it is you 'throwing your dummy on the floor' by requesting your donation back based on my observation, you really are a sensitive bunch. Oh and no you can't have your imaginary donation back.

Date 01/09/12
Incident considered Dangerous lift in the 50th minute (Crookes)
Decision Charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF CAUTION Rule: 15.1(d) Detail - Dangerous Throw Player lifts opponent into a dangerous position however opponent lands on back/shoulder. Concerning technique worth of MRP Caution.
____________________________

Date 01/09/12
Incident considered Punching in the 50th minute (Seymour)
Decision Charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF CAUTION Rule: 15.1(a) Detail - Punching - Reaction to Opponent - Lashing out. Player lashes out at opponent whilst on the ground after being tackled. Unclear as to nature of contact however unnecessary actions worthy of MRP Caution

Signing for you as a replacement for jeffries

bit difficult given our lack of quota spots

And to think I cared about what was happening at Bradford.

I'll make a deal with, you keep Crookes and take Seymour of our hands and then maybe I'll allow you to be back in my good books.

Adios amigo