Rumours suggesting that Kopczak's move to Huddersfield has broken down with other clubs supposedly interested. Not sure how much truth there is to this rumour but seems strange that he would terminate his contract to try get a move to the Giants and then be unable to agree terms. Surely he would have made sure Huddersfield were offering the contract he wanted before terminating?

There could of course be the slight problem of his player registration. IIRC the RFL said they would do what they needed to do to make sure other SL teams kept to the non-poaching agreement?

A case of...He who wields the knife never inherits the crown, even?

If true he is pretty much black listed then isnt he

No...just would mean the RFL would not register him to Hudds because they allegedly broke the anti-poaching agreement (if any of this was true). Nothing to stop him signing for another club - he declined to be TUPEd across from Bradford so is a free agent, and no other club is alleged to have tried to poach him against the agreement, so there is no reason for the RFL to decline to register his transfer?

Of course, if other clubs were to find they could not match the alleged Hudds package, potentially by quite a fair bit, and so Kopout found he was earning a lot less than he expected to, I feel sure all his former teammates would be totally gutted for him?

The thing is, even if another club wanted to sign Kopout they would still have to approach Bradford regarding his registration. So either he accepts the TUPE, though I'm not sure he can now he's handed in his resignation, the Bulls get a transfer fee, or Kopout sits out a year without pay.

Lets just hope it gets sorted quickly, we dont want negotiations about a player that doesnt want to play for us dragging on until next season per the Awford situation, we need to get replacements in asap.

Kop has come up trumps massively! Wait and watch...

I could see him playing for us again if this isn't sorted out quick.

depends entirely how much saints are paying him doesnt it. If he wasnt allowed to sign for hudds by rfl then saints could conceivably have got him for less money than hudds were allegedly prepared to pay.

Not at all, the only club/s who would have a problem are any club/s who broke the RFL gentlemens' agreement. It is the RFL who either agree to or refuse to accept registrations, it is a matter for them, and not for the club. Like Leeds could not stop Bradford getting Harris's registration.

If Kopczak is a free agent, then it wouldn't be an issue for any club who wanted to sign him. You could say that the former category of club would be viewed as sinners but the latter as saints.

I see on telegraph and argus
That Bateman has apparently signed for hull FC
Any truth in this??? Or just rumour? It doesn't look like bulls are shouting from the rooftops about signings.
What with koppy Sykes and potentially Bateman leaving bulls along with crookes
It does appear that the rats are escaping from the sinking ship!

On the T&A forums?
In that case it is almost certainly the absolute truth. That is the only place I ever look for news.

Sinking ship? You want to be very careful what bile you spout.

Could see Koppy ending up at Wigan with his Welsh coach.....

They've lreleasing Fielden and Lima too I believe, so need someone to fill the void. Koppy lives the wrong side of the Pennines now too.

Lima is goin bak to os i think isnt he?

If I see fielden i shal quiz him about the bulls

Diskin was quoted in this weeks Rugby rags that he would welcome Craig back into the squad if he wanted to return to Bulls. Whether Craig himself sees a future at the Bulls for himself only he knows. If he thinks he made a mistake and is ready to commit his future to the Bulls then I'd welcome him back as a supporter.

We need players signing who are 100% committed though.

Have the captains contacted koppy? Doubt it! And
After the abuse and gip I've seen floating around on twitter
From the bulls fans I follow direct to koppy I would have to say
I wouldn't return to bulls!!
Also didn't whitehead openly slate Kopczak in the rag?

Confidential information - careful you don't fall foul of the Data Protection Act, you could find Yourself in deep do-do if someone takes exception to your lack of professionalism.

Injuries in the NRL are posted openly by the Clubs and the papers and other media use that information, not the culture of paronia displayed by the SL Clubs in the UK

If it's been posted on the T&A then you can usually safely disregard it. Some real nutters and oddballs on there.....not like here at all

Data Protection act covers, well data protection, not that you've seen/talked to someone and told people about it. Unless he's going to post his medical records I'll think he'll be just fine.

So wrong there. Go ask Leeds Trust about what happened when information about certain celebrity patients was leaked? Posting stuff ike that is madness on a public forum - it is almost certainly in breach of his contract of employment, breaches patient confidentiality and could get him sacked and his hospital trust into very deep water.

And I know a bit on this because my wife works for one of the biggest hospital Trusts, and in her position knows much about who is receiving oncology and other treatment and for what, and is fully aware of her responsibilities regarding confidentiality and trust.

If I am visiting at X Hospital and see player A. Bloggs there, then I am free to talk about it.

If I work at X Hospital then, very clearly, I am absolutely not at liberty to reveal in public that any named person was being treated at my hospital, and if caught doing so would risk the sack for breach of patient confidentiality.

I'll ask before TT does..........Did you get his Autograph?