Koppy or Hargreaves? My vote would be Koppy - think he deserves it after last season. On a different tack I am old fashioned enough to like to see my first team numbered as close to 1 - 13 as possible, so would prefer Kearney at 1. Anyone else fussed or am I just a boring old f**t.

totally agree with your opinion on squad numbers.it gives the lower squad members something to aspire to and a sense of pride for those that have earned the numbers in the first place.

Is Hargreaves a prop? Can't remember seeing him this season.

Good question, I would say Koppy but MP may choose the new bloke?

I think Potter likes having the players 1-13 as well so we should be seeing Koppy in the No. 10 shirt next year.

I know Kopczak has come on, but Prime Minister? I have reservations.

Though TBF he would definitely be an improvement on present occupant.

Koppy should get a shout for first choice number10. Having said that, I think it would be nice to have the luxury to be able to rotate the props, to allow for a bit of RnR.

Also i've never really been a fan of squad numbers either so, back to tradition for me

I'd go with a 1-13 as follows:

1. Kearney
2. Ainscough
3. Lulia
4. Purtill
5. Kear
6. Briggs
7. Gale
8. Scruton
9. L'estrange
10. Koppy
11. Elima
12. Whitehead
13. Langley

Based on what my starting 13 would be next year.

Koppy, without a doubt.

Tony Benn. But he's retired, sadly. Possibly Dennis Skinner.

McNamara might get an invite to no. 10 if England perform a miracle in the Four Nations.

I'll carry him all way from Hull on my shoulders if they do.

Doubt it mate, An RL team winning the four nations, or even the World Cup, are just the sort of reasons they brought back the BEM, I think they would just get them through the post. They certainly wouldn't be wanting all these RL oiks in number 10, good heavens they didn't even go to schools that have fagging........positive heathens!!

Ed Balls.

or Koppy.

not fussed which.

Agree, after last years performance deserves the no 10 shirt

Surely not Tony Benn at 10, always could be tackled by going left time and time again.
And the Beast was never a viable selection for 10, he could only huff and puff and never
find his way to the try line.

Redamberandblack.net home of trotskites, marxists, stalinists despite the fact that millions died at the hands of world communism throughout the last century.

People die. Get over it.

Woah.... Over my head!!??

BNP man is back.

To be fair, its a well known fact that fascists never killed anyone...

Civilians Killed by Governments in the Twentieth Century: Top Twenty Regimes

Location (Regime)
Deaths
Era

Soviet Union (Communists) 61,900,000
1917-1990
China (Communists) 35,200,000
1949-present
Germany (Nazi Third Reich) 20,900,000
1933-1945
China (Kuomintang) 10,400,000
1928-1949
Japan (Imperial-Fascist) 6,000,000
1936-1945
China (Communist Guerrillas) 3,500,000
1923-1948
Cambodia (Communists) 2,000,000
1975-1979
Turkey ("Young Turks"icon_wink.gif 1,900,000
1909-1917
Vietnam (Communists) 1,700,000
1945-present
North Korea (Communists) 1,700,000
1948-present
Poland (Communists) 1,600,000
1945-1948
Pakistan (Yahya Khan) 1,500,000
1971
Mexico (Porfiriato) 1,400,000
1900-1920
Yugoslavia (Communists) 1,100,000
1944-1990
Russia (Czarist) 1,100,000
1900-1917
Turkey (Mustafa Kemal "Ataturk"icon_wink.gif 900,000
1918-1923
United Kingdom (Constitutional) 800,000
1900-present
Portugal (Fascist) 700,000
1926-1975
Croatia (Fascists) 700,000
1941-1945
Indonesia (Suharto) 600,000
1965-present

Yeah but those Che Guevara t shirts did look cool.

Oh I love those Channel 4 top twenty shows. When was this one on? I think I missed it.

Poor little Belgium. They put so much effort into killing all those Congonese and they never make these lists.

Awesome thread drift btw, well done everybody.