He seems to have a problem with whether he has broken the rules or are the rules fair

Imagine if the independent panel withhold the original ruling, his meltdown will be off the charts.

One thing that puzzled me about all this though, is what Marwan said they were actually docked the points for in his recent press conference. There wasn't any mention of the supposed double contract for Puletua, they were pulled up on rent payments and medical bills for a player's wife.
So if he's being truthful here, whatever happened to the Puletua stuff? Was it all above board? Is that the separate charge the RFL are rumoured to be bringing against them?

Not sure that's accurate, although I agree that's the way the good doc is trying to portray it. The current version of the Operational Rules clearly states:

I thought the same thing last week when the anti-RFL piece was doing the rounds. It would make more sense of the points deduction and fine if it did only relate to the rent etc., but as you say, does beg the question as to what has happened with the evidence from the Puletua case.

Didn't I read they were found not guilty or insufficient evidence on the Puletua part? Mentioned as part of his nutty press conference? Although I admit I may have dreamed that.