Quote ="Sensei-Bull"I'm unclear what Koukash is banging on about with this one? He appears to be claiming that the RFL have no right interfering with a salary cap investigation as the courts have already ruled in Salford's favour? Am I missing something as I was under the impression that Salford where in court to rule over a dispute with Tony Puletua (which is where the double contract issue came up), not for a salary cap hearing. I'm assuming that the courts won't have had any interest in the salary cap?
Am I understanding this correctly?
To say Koukash has so much money he does seem short of a few shillings at the same time.'"
That's pretty much what's happened, yeah. And in addition to that someone on the VT is claiming that the court didn't exactly 'rule in Salford's favour' either. Tony was claiming for monies owed via the second contract. The court ruled that Salford rugby club didn't owe Tony anything, but that his claim against the other company was valid and the court ordered the second contract to be honoured. So essentially Tony got what he was after.
However I should point out that the poster on the VT didn't back this up with any proof so it could quite easily all be a load of nonsense.