I thought last year most of the world was treated to photgraphic evidence of the preference of Oz players for their mates pets? Or was it just some biazzar pre-signing initiation ceremony for the Wolves?

I have not seen the photographic evidence for the Monaghan case, but it is surely another example of the strange Aussie/NRL morality. Other than a possible case of animal cruelty, why should such off-field issues determine whether a player is sacked or not? Unless criminal acts are being committed, what happens off the field should have no bearing on the game IMO.

www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6534800180 More here on the Burgii living it up in Sydney. To think this could have happened at Bradford! I reckon Sammy would have a better chance of finding a girlfirend in Bradford in all honesty.

www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6534800180 More here on the Burgii living it up in Sydney. To think this could have happened at Bradford! I reckon Sammy would have a better chance of finding a girlfirend in Bradford in all honesty.

Did not realise that Tom had a big offer on the table from Wigan before he left

What a great article - Didn't realise what Sam went through when his Dad was ill