Wigan to win by 1 point.

Deacon drop goal

Charnley was moving away from the ball and clearly didn't play at it so that decision was actually correct.

I'm not quite sure what you mean here, he took a swing at the ball, missed and then touched the ball with his leg. As he went to kick the ball then surely even if he then tries to not touch the ball it doesn't matter, he has still intended to play the ball.

The first connection with the ball I saw was from the Leeds player, to be honest, I don't think Charnley was really ever in range of kicking the ball(so even if you view that he flung out a leg, he missed) until the Leeds player propelled it into him, and by then he was going backwards and couldn't get out of the way. Correct decision for me.

I see your point and maybe it is not as clear cut a decision as I thought, for me though as soon as he took a swing at the ball he was classed as playing at the ball and therefore once he touched the ball it should of been Leeds ball.

It would be interesting if any of the refs on here could clarify, not to prove anyone right, just for future reference?

Like all such decisions it's what is referred to as a 'judgement call' from the ref. At the end of then day that's what he is there to do but when we come down to 'intent' it does get a bit difficult, even when you have video evidence to look at, but the poor old ref (admittedly with the help of a touchie) has to make his mind up pretty quickly so it's hardly surprising we get some controversial decisions.