Quote ="Ferocious Aardvark"The reason it was a handover was because the only two people in the ground who failed to spot Hull touching the ball, and thus wiping the slate, were the nearside linesman and the ref. I suppose Worrincy never considered it was possible the ref had failed to see it.
Not as bad as the miss when the Hull fullback blatantly handled a kick which went dead, but the officials never saw it and ruled a tap on the 20. The Hull lads near me have probably never laughed so hard as they did at that decision.
The one the blind linesman did spot was the alleged foot over the dead ball line - now I am in no position to say one way or the other, but the in-goal judge, who was stood no more than a metre or so away, said it was OK - yet the touchie, about 25 metres away, told the ref the foot was over the line. Whether it was or wasn't - why would the ref prefer that view over the chap stood next to it?
All very amusing.'"
All absolutely true. Some terrible officiating yesterday.
Back on the subject at hand, is it wrong I was calling for Worrincy to get the ball as much as possible all the way through the game?