I went to a Bradford game last season and was very unimpressed at some of the foulmouthed levels of abuse he was recieving of some sections of support, who should hang their heads in shame after how you have performed at the end of last season, following it through to this one.

Indeed. Instead, we are back to this sort of shiitake mushrooms from him:



Because if what? I'll explain; Eddie is childishly and absurdly claiming that:
"[ithe next time someone claims to have heard something from a club insider[/i" then I must, every time, "[itake what they say at face value[/i". If ever once I do not, then I am "[ia complete hypocrite[/i".

So, I can't give credence to what Adey ever says (Adey BTW FWIW having ironically specifically said his info was NOT from a club insider - but when did such trivial details ever make a difference to someone with ME's convoluted 'logic'), even on the sensible grounds that to me he is a reliable chap. If I believe Adey - then I must believe everyone else too. And if I don't then by process of ME 'logic', I will be "[ia complete hypocrite[/i".

So it is not possible to choose whom to believe on Planet Eddie. The claims of all posters, even the nuttiest troll, are to be viewed alike. You must believe all, or none.

Eddie, your proposition is utter and unmitigated bollox. Even you must see that. How can you even come up with such arrant nonsense?

Of course not. However, I still think that being the fourth lowest spenders is a pile of turd too.

So what did this person say?

And I also have heard that we are the fourth lowest spender (or in the bottom four? can't remember exactly) but (and this is the bit that might hurt some) have been able to attract some of our bigger names due to our reputation and to the plans for the future. Pretty sure that Macnamara played a big part in that.

was it a comment from hood in a piece in league express a couple of months back. Seems vaguely familiar though I seem to remember it said lower spenders rather than specifically saying 4th lowest.