i think they should diasble comments for all articles. there's not many that post useful things anyway.

Why? The comments thing obviously attracts hits which, given that the T&A are probably funded from advertising, translates into revenue (no matter how little). Of course, if the comments required significant moderation time then they'd probably pull it.

Given the idiot posts and the abuse i've seen it descend to, it won't be long before moderation is required.

I like reading comments on anything the council tries to do ever. It's hard to tell whether an incompetent council or a population of morons has the greater part of the blame for Bradford's ills.

Some belters on the article about Peter Hoods comments on OSV made at the AGM. I don't know what's worse the shortsited comments from City fans claiming the council are conspiring against them despite the fact the original plans had nothing to do with them and their ground is owned by an outside party on a restrictive agreement in which they entered into or the complete lack of any ambition from the Bulls fans on there.