Since most parties involved have now said they aren't going to say any more on the matter, is it not worth locking this now?


(I appreciate I said I wasn't gonna bother reading it again, but I was bored

)

FA?

That poster can presumably only have been another mod? And not necessarily on this board?

If that is the case, is that person fit to be a mod?

1. Not a mod.
2. Not from this board.
3. Probably not!

(BTW I said I did not want to comment on the issue anymore but I am merely replying to questions!)

To avoid any possibility of doubt . . . . . it's me



I'm the one . . . .

This Mod/poster is the one that ME has the, apparently ongoing, issues with.

This Mod/poster is the one that commented, on a private board, that he was not disappointed that ME had taken his bat home and wasn't posting at that time. . . . along, broadly speaking, with the earlier comments on this thread about ME's ability to get reactions out of other posters with his comments/games. There was also some flippant comment about repairing Hadrian's Wall . . . . . . .

This mod/poster is the one who went to some length to discuss the issue, by PM, with ME when he chose to post several paper thin veiled / barbed comments about the above several months ago.

This is the Mod who still has the PM's from ME on that position and our joint agreeing to move on.

This is the Mod/poster who hasn't commented publicly on other PM comments (sort of like private boards really - ironic or what

)

This is the Mod who is content in the knowledge that his integrity, following that slip in judgment, is better intact.

This is the Mod/poster who's come back from doing Her Maj's bidding for a second night and found even more spewing of emotion and playground tactics . . . . and so is locking this thread (that'll be the because I'm the most unimpartial moderator ever seen on a message board, apparently)