if you read my post you'd realise I meant how much game time for the bulls. 10 tries in 32 games, 8 of which came last year, isnt a terrible return for a young 2nd rower imo.

as comparison , and just using their records for us

morrison 15 tries in 39 games, 3 last year
cook 5 tries in 51 games ( 0 in his 29+ appearances for us), 5 last year
burgess 9 in 57 games, 6 last year

worrincy outscored all three of those last year and yet they are perceived as better players ( something im not argueing with btw), All im saying is that he deserves more than 4 games, with probably less than 100 minutes total time on pitch before you write him off

I was refering to the person above to be honest. He broke through almost fours seasons ago. Round 14 Mid 2006 according to the stats that the above person has provided, so that's what, 13 remaining in 2006, 27 in 2007 and 27 in 2008 and 7 in 2009 so far. So that makes it 74 games since 2006 that's 'if he hasn't been injured' he has been available for yet has only played in 34 of them. Mike probably isn't going to get much game time again this season either, clearly something is limiting his game time and to me it's plainly obvious that it is his limited ability as a rugby player. Nothing agaisnt the lad, but I think we'd have been better spending the money elsewhere as opposed to a player more than likley will never be anything more than a bit part player during his career. Our own juniors could be doing the job that Mike is, just as good if not better than Mick.

We no a song about too many Cooks don't we boys and girls.

Spot on. I can assure you all that he is only going as 19th man and won't be playing barring injury. But he seems to be making great strides very quickly.