The reason Lance isn't playing at 6. www.sthelensstar.co.uk/sport/976 ... tree_Park/

The reason Lance isn't playing at 6. www.sthelensstar.co.uk/sport/976 ... tree_Park/

Quote ="roader"The reason Lance isn't playing at 6. www.sthelensstar.co.uk/sport/976 ... tree_Park/'" He stops just short of saying "because he simply can't play #6 for toffee"...

Quote ="roader"The reason Lance isn't playing at 6. www.sthelensstar.co.uk/sport/976 ... tree_Park/'" He stops just short of saying "because he simply can't play #6 for toffee"...

Quote ="roader"The reason Lance isn't playing at 6. www.sthelensstar.co.uk/sport/976 ... tree_Park/'" Because he isn't one. Let's hope it may be a lesson that Rush takes away from his involvement in this game...

Quote ="roader"The reason Lance isn't playing at 6. www.sthelensstar.co.uk/sport/976 ... tree_Park/'" Because he isn't one. Let's hope it may be a lesson that Rush takes away from his involvement in this game...

I think we have found the position that suits his game.All he did tonight was pick the ball up at the play the ball and pass it to the nearest player to him and he did that in slow motion.

Doesn't engage the defenders enough IMO...safe option to fill in, but that's about it

I thought his passing was poor to be honest. He looks as average a hooker as he is Stand Off.

Average. You are being very generous.I would say,crap..........

I was , I just didnt want to be accused of trolling

I think the lance hohaia problem at saints is a simple one. He can't play stand off and will never make a stand off as long as he lives, he can't play hooker and will never be anything other than a below average hooker.

If he dont play fullback, he shouldnt play at all, simple!

To be honest SP I have my doubts he could do that for us.He doesn't look interested.I hope I am wrong because we have got him for another 3 years.

Fullback has more hope for him as its his proper postion.

He's to slow at stand off and hooker, I don't mean running but his passing and speed of thought which IMO comes being used to having time and space from fullback, you just don't have that time and space at 6 or 9.

It's turned into a complete disaster of a signing!

I think he is to slow for FB.I agree a complete disaster of a signing.

Well, according to the time trials or whatever they call it at rugby training when they find out the fastest player, Hohaia is actually our fastest player. That's if you're talking about running, as opposed to speed of thought or ball passing, in which case he must be one of our slowest.

Have you ever seen that on match day.

I was on about speed of thought and speed of his passing. He's pretty quick running.

You have seen something I haven't.

They did time trials and he was one of the quickest (could have been the fastest )

He could be the fastest in SL in TIME TRIALS but I have not seen evidence of this on the pitch in a real game.Not for us and he didn't show this tonight at any time.

I am hoping he can kick on next season if we do keep him. I remember Britt having a slow first season, and I think I can also remember a fair few people wanting him gone.

He'd be better than the Slug u currently have at FB

We didnt have the problem of trying to fit Britt in to a postion as he wasa prop, we don't know where to play lance and IMO we are just picking him accomadate him.

If I was lee Gaskell I'd be wondering what the hell I've got to do to get a game when the guy playing in my postion has been so bad.

I thought Hohaia played ok for the Exiles. He wasn't world class but if he was he wouldn't be over here. Most of his passes were short ones but in that weather you can't expect anything different but I thought his defence was very good and he put in a few decent kicks one that was an inch off being a 40-20 and had it been fan favourite sir Lee Gaskell to put that kick in most fans would have been nursing a semi and demanding a contract extension for him.

Oh behave,Gaskell was dropped to take him out of the fireing line after all the stick he was takeing from the fans.
Lance Is poor,the fact that one of his plus points was that he didnt kick a 40-20 sums It up.

Gaskell was removed from the team because he isn't good enough! So you don't see someone being an inch of a 40-20 under pressure as a good kick? You prove my point though leaping to the defence of Gaskell! if it was him it would have been a good kick just because it's Gaskell. People have made their mind up that Hohaia isn't a favourite and that's it nothing he does from now until he leaves will ever be good enough.

No irony In your post Is there?