You've interpreted a statement detailing a two year contract with an option for a FURTHER year as a one year contract because it suits you to do so in your capacity as a wind up merchant. Fair play, but don't be surprised when people point out how daft you sound.

It wasn't ambiguous in terms of length of contract. You are looking for something that isn't there.

It was ambiguous by in saying the one year option was from 2014, both can't be correct unless Saints have to take the final year option in 2014.

It should have been written something like this.
" Luke Walsh has signed a two-year contract with the club for the 2014 and 2015 seasons with a further one year option in 2016."

Did you clutch any straws?

You obviously don't understand the use of commas. See previous post re. =#FF0000Removed

Ps. The statement can't be all that ambiguous seeing as everyone on here, including you, knows what it means. You said as much when suggesting how you would have worded it.

The statement is much clearer than the Wigan statement regarding Sam Tomkins leaving.

Oh hang on, they haven't bothered to let the fans know that their best player has signed for NZ warriors.

ST.HELENS R.F.C. would like to state that, contrary to incorrect reports in Australia, Luke Walsh has signed a two-year contract with the club=#FF0000, with an option for a further year=#FF0000, from 2014.

Saints are looking forward to welcoming the Penrith Panthers' scrum half next season alongside his teammate Mose Masoe.

A club spokesman added that the option is in the player's favour.

Rogues obviously missed the beautifully placed commas meaning a small break in the sentence to explain the additional year!!!

Well done Rogues!