Just said same thing, it's his decision making in defence that worries me.

I have a worry a clever team will target his postion in defence.

He gives alot in attack though which we needed.

One things for sure next year, we will have a very strong front row.

If perry settles and tony p plays the way he has this year and add graham and LMS, thats 4 very good props and two good hookers in moore and roby, it looks good.

Perry
Roby
Graham
Sia
Flannery
Wilkin

Tony p
LMS
Moore
Clough

That IMO is a very strong pack and very strong bench, we also have magennis, dixon, ashurst, emmitt and maybe frodsham all on the outside looking in.

With the amount of 2nd rows we have next year means wilkin should play 13 and stay there. Maybe if he sticks at loose forward we might see the form of 2006 return, he needs to get back to the player he was and not a grafter, we have enough of them to allow wilkin to get back to a attacking loose.

dont know how you can say moore is a good hooker, hes terrible, he carnt pass kick tackle and even attack, im suprised that he can get into our 17

Moore's distribution is the best in the club. It's been a long time since we had a hooker who could pass.

For that one sentence alone I'm going to completely disregard anything you ever say in the future.

It's not often i agree with ski but moores passing from acting half is much quicker than cunninghams has ever been.

Moores passing in nornal play is shocking at times.

It is also brilliant at times. Maybe the shocking passes will lessen with confidence and experience or maybe they won't, and it's a thing we will have to live with in order to get the benefits, which are some brilliant passes and some very enthusiastic defence!

i would have preffered we brought back smith instead, as he also covers hooker

Too late. He's signed for Salford.

ino i mean at the start of season