Ablett should be looking at at least 4 games imo but I didn't really see the Bailey incident.

It was same old same old at Leeds tonight. The South Stand referee the game, they get away with murder and then you get a load of arrogant ti*s giving you abuse after the game.

It always makes any win against them that bit sweeter and as i've just posted on our board I hope you take the win next week. I just can't be bothered anymore with the whole attitiude of the Leeds club.

Ablett dirty Btard

Bailey probably a warning

I think the pies have wane down for coach of the year, he's on a 2 match winning streak and 100% record.

Best coach in super league

NO, but McGuire is.

And I agree mate.

Phil Clarke's tears when Coley got binned was my personal highlight. It actually sounded like he was going to burst into floods of tears any second. Of course Ganson got the decision wrong but christ you'd think the world had ended the way Clarke went on.

I think Ablett will get a ban this time around but only because of the player he tried to take out of the game. If it had been any other player I think he would get off but seeing as it is Sam then a ban looks looming.

Is correct.

diddums.

He is right though.
Leeds have been getting away with their dirty tactics for years.
I can't believe I am on the same side as a Wiganer.

And I can't actually believe I'm hoping Saints beat both Wire tonight and Leeds next week. I said after the cup game when we got beat by Leeds and the same dirty tactics then that whoever they play in the Semi's I hope they get beat.

Yes yes, there's a huge cover up in the rfl and Leeds get away with everything.

How ironic.

Is a Leeds player allowed to be sent off at Headingley? I can't remember the last time a Leeds player got binned or shown a red. Particularly against either us or Stains.

Hope they don't come out playing the same dirty tactics as those other matches or I might be doing a Minnie Cotton on them next week

(Mini Rogue if you don't know who she is just ask your old man

)

I can't remember to be honest. Do you REALLY think the Rfl have a hidden agenda to try and make Leeds win?

I don't think it is a hidden agenda to give Leeds a win. More a hidden agenda not to ban their players.

I don't know, but the Ablett incident especially was even worse watching back when we got home. I actually didn't think it was that bad at the game probably as we was behind the sticks, but when I get txts at the game from Saints fans saying its a shocker then you know its a bad one and Ganson in particular isn't usually afraid of showing the card. Especially when you consider the 2 soft yellow cards we've had at Leeds this year when you compare the incidents.

Says it all really, i can think of a dozen times in the last few years ive seen a red card at the DW

I agree he should of seen a red for it. However, the Referee can't see every incident under the sun, and I think if he failed to see what happened, putting the player on report is the best option under those circumstances. I'm sure had Gansen seen the incident the correct decision would have been made, nothing to do with him desperate to keep Leeds players on the field.

Believe what you want, I can assure you there won't be a massive scandal down at Red hall.

There won't be a ban for Ablett, either. And it doesn't matter what Bailey does, he doesn't get a ban. All it takes is for your coach and his ugly face to appear at Red Hall and all Leeds players up for punishment get let off, usually with a warning letter or a fine.

Ablett should be banned for that tackle. He won't be though.

I am willing to wager than Ablett will pick up at least a one match ban for that. Again, stop being so paranoid.

They may still be banned since it seems to be affected by the prominence of the player also. Ablett and Bailey are not as important to Leeds as, say, Morley and Carvell were (to Wire) when they were freed to play against the big game with us, after trying to decapitate players the previous week.

In the same way Peacock was allowed to swat Sam Tomkins around the head twice in the same tackle against us, because he is a prominent player and had an important game the following week.

They'll make less consequential bans on lesser name players to make sure the balance looks good, and so Ablett may get 3.

Not paranoid. But he won't get a ban. He should have got a red card, actually, and I was disappointed in Ganson for not sending him off. Ganson used to have balls but it would appear they have shrivelled since his leg injury. I assume only breaking someone's neck would constitute a red these days.