Couldn't care less if you think backrow in your opinion is closer to what you feel the bans should be.

I took into account hocks utter shocking record for drugs, gouging (lowest of the low), grabbing a ref and whatever else he's done.

I think Magennis was cowardly as was mossops punch.

I don't think Tuson did much wrong other than defend himself.

Not usually one to defend Hock, but he has been charged in accordance with the disciplinary rules, for the offence that took place on the day.

His record may have an influence on whether he receives the minimum (1 game) or the maximum (2 games) but that's in the sentence not the charge.

Mossop launched a punch every bit as cheap as Magennis's and therefore Mossop deserves a lengthier ban than Tuson. AFter watching it a few more times, the bans I'd have gone with:

Hock - 2
Tuson - 1
Mossop - 3
Magennis - 5 (because he didn't just lamp Tuson with a sly one, but went at a few wi*an players)

Compare this 'brawl' with the one in the latest state of origin and its no worse.
That one resulted in a sin bin which is all this deserved.

Send 2 from each team to bin and tell the rest to cool down.

Forwards should be able to trade a few punches without the red card coming out

THREE red cards? FIVE matches for a punch?

Yay for the emasculation of Rugby League!

A punch to the head can kill. It's always going to happen, but that doesn't mean it should be condoned or justified. Entertaining for the fans, but we'd think differently if something bad happened, wouldn't we.

This is comedy. ever thought about stand up?

also lets stop with this lie that mossop's hit was a cheap shot. as he hits him he is being swung at himself. magennis is trying to unload, mossop puts him in his place.

i encourage you to watch it again, as this is plainly obvious. do you stand there and take the shot of magennis? or do you take care of him. Mossop decides to take care of him.

what is cowardly about going head to head with the lad?

if you wish to continue lying about mossop giving a cheap shot go ahead, but the video evidence clearly shows magennis about to hit mossop after teeing off against tuson and lockers.

I can see
hock 1 game
tuson 2 games
mossop (EGP) 1 game
magennis 4 games.

I'm quite sure Magennis didn't get up that morning thinking he'd king-hit a pie-eater. It's very unlikely he was thinking such sixty seconds before the incident occurred and I'm willing to bet he felt very sorry after. Fighting is an unavoidable function of a very, very tough game. A team is losing, an incident occurs somewhere on the pitch, tempers boil over, the red mist descends and suddenly you have a whole load of people [ithinking outside their normal, rational patterns of behaviour[/i. Had Magennis cold-cocked the kid as he was walking out of the tunnel I'd think differently as there would be clear premeditation.

Yes, a punch can kill - but so can any number of other actions. Hell, sportsmen have been known to keel over and die without a finger being laid upon them.

Ultimately it's about where you draw the line (not to mention whether a player accepts the risks and is willing to play regardless). Watching the incident again I saw NOTHING (from players on either side) to stir any card other than yellow (two young packs of testosterone-fuelled stags letting off steam). It's a travesty that such a relatively minor incident has the governing body handing out whopping bans.

I mean, let's just cut the sport's balls off and have done with it.

I think your idea of what you think are justifiable penalties for these offences are guided more by a sense of revenge and hatred for a team, town, and players rather than any real thought of what is appropriate to what actually happened. YELLOW CARDS, 10 MINUTES, COOL OFF, GET BACK ON THE PITCH AND SHAKE HANDS AT FULL-TIME...NO ONE WENT TO HOSPITAL, OR DIED!!!!





Rock 'n' Roll.

It's highly likely he wasn't thinking at all. Unlike LMS, who most definitely was.

Hock should be put down. Is that an option?

Under some rule, somewhere in the RFL vaults, maybe; but I am sure that the DPP may get involved !!

I think in the case of Hock, it'd be more likely to be the RSPCA.

He will opt for an early exit sooner or later. Am sure there will be much wailing again, about what a great person and hero he was. I would prefer to put it down to darwinian selection.

Hock getting 2 match ban is a joke, he started the brawl, he should be banned for life. we don't need his sort in the game, the game is tough enough without thugs like him in it. His drug ban was bad enough and this conduct just proves what a idiot he is. Put him down like a mad dog he is.

a bit much that, he's not killed a child!

oops!

I like that picture.

How about this one.. www.mirror.co.uk/sport/rugby-lea ... -st-850613

How about this one.. www.mirror.co.uk/sport/rugby-lea ... -st-850613

Quote ="wigan pier"How about this one.. www.mirror.co.uk/sport/rugby-lea ... -st-850613'" In that image: Quote ="Brett Finch"Why can't we just all be friends! '"

Quote ="wigan pier"How about this one.. www.mirror.co.uk/sport/rugby-lea ... -st-850613'" In that image: Quote ="Brett Finch"Why can't we just all be friends! '"

To be fair, in his post match interview he did say that he's no good at fighting!

Quote ="wigan pier"How about this one.. www.mirror.co.uk/sport/rugby-lea ... -st-850613'" Where is the 5 match ban for Magennis eye gouging? Shocking caption. Finch's face is pretty funny though. Looks like he's about to burst into tears.

Quote ="wigan pier"How about this one.. www.mirror.co.uk/sport/rugby-lea ... -st-850613'" Where is the 5 match ban for Magennis eye gouging? Shocking caption. Finch's face is pretty funny though. Looks like he's about to burst into tears.