I was saying same thing earlier in the thread!

IMO Kyle has made more of a impact then we thought he would.

Speak for yourself!!

I did do, however you obviously either didn't read mine properly or understand it.

so you don't think Kyle is playing better than YOU thought he would?

Only 20yr old and with only started 6 games has already won a derby in last min, got MOM against wolves, played very well at stoop and not to mention his try and goal record.

I'd thought that pretty good.

It's obvious you don't from you un called for bitchy comment.

I think she was saying Kyle is realising the potential he had, therefore we aren't surprised by it.

I think he's doing as well as I expected him to. Like I said earlier in this thread, his in game kicking still needs some improving (obviously, he's only a relative newbie to the game compared to the majority of his opponents). In my eyes, if he keeps improving at the rate he is, he is going to be a great player in a few years, so long as he gets the support he needs from players like Pryce & Long.

so can you explain the speak for yourself!!! Comment?

Because I can't see why you would say that if you agree that Kyle I'd doing better than expected.

Strange hey

'speak for yourself' meaning, you're presuming that everyone agree's with you. A pet hate of mine.

the "we" was used as saints. Not you!

Also alice, read the threads.

All are saying just how well this kid as done. He is making a impact that is missing few star names also.

It seems it's only you that thinks he not faired better than we thought.

Christ! What more can the young lad do!!!!

I think you are misinterpreting what I am saying.
I'm not saying that he's not doing well, he is, bloody well. He's coping with the pressure that's been put on him in Long's absence. But, the best is yet to come.

errr ok?? So you do agree that he is doing better than WE thought?

Maybe the "speak for yourelf!!!!" comment was made just to make yourself look good. A pet hate of mine.

No, I think he's doing as well as we expected. We knew he was good, and he's proving that to be true. Obviously people have different expectations of players, and for me I expected him to step up to the plate when he got his chance, and he has.
I'd much rather him have a consistant season in being 'good', and continue to improve and develop. Than have him have one season of him being amazing, just for him to drop off in the seasons to come like many players have before.

Eastmond played well. Sam played well. What's the point of arguing who's better at this point, give 'em some time to establish themselves ey? I just hope they can develop into a partnership that can finally give the aussies some problems.

It's a frightening/wonderful prospect!

wake up and smell the kangaroo dung!

for every eastmond or tomkins we have, the aussies have three of them

they may well do, but they can only play one at a time

:clap:

Yes but we also have Myler, Ratchford and Wheeler who will be very good players.

We have some very good young forwards and now we have some very good young halves. If we could just get some outside backs we might actually give them a game every once in a while.

It didn't stop New Zealand winning the world cup though did it.

Martin 'Erm...' Offiah said he's a mixture of Jason Robinson, Muhammad Ali and Ellery Hanley. He could quit RL for union, boxing or ice skating any minute now...

that is quite right! but i didnt mention world cups i said for every eastmond and tomkins we have the aussies have three! If you england had won the world cup then i would have tipped my cap at you

the point was more about strength in depth to allow for injuries and such like. If you know about rugby you would agree with my comment and just move on with the thread surely. As for the nz world cup win over the aussies, well the sun shines up a dogs backside some days. Reference the salford win over us

thanks statto, your point is?
i know all this