Mal Meninga

Cayless was the corner stone of 2006. He was a classy prop, lots of hard yards, always had an offload coming. Christ, he even had an excellent .

You're right about that.

Ricky stuart said Cayless had 0% body fat when he was at the Roosters and one of the best props around. Shame about his injuries.

Maybe if he had a little more fat he wouldn't have got injured.

He'd be dead.

That would explain why we haven't seen him in a while then!

Shouldn't laugh really...

Appletiser all over keyboard. YOU are fixing that!

a cheat.

Didn't you see the microphone hanging out of his psuedo pony tail after the 07 grand final.

firstly if he had 0& bodyfat he'd be dead.

secondly if he had even close to that he'd have the physique of a pro bodybuilder getting ready to compete, not a rugby player.

Most rugby players will be around 12/14%, some forwards as high as 18-20%.

You obviously aren't keeping track of the thread.

Saying that, with a name like that you are obviously a troll or an idiot. I'll give you the benefit of doubt and go with the first.

Who?

A couple of points
1)excellent post, agree entirely.
2)who are you and where is saddened?

Its funny how Fielden gets slated, but Cayless is very much the forgotten man.

He was superb up there with Fielden in his prime but both are shadow's of there former selves, yet still only Fielden gets slated despite him actually taking the field.

Perhaps being the forgotten man is not such a bad thing.

For what its worth I would not be surprised to see him come back and make a go of it in the NRL.

As if to almost repeat myself, a couple of points
1)cayless has been very good when fit, his body has just let him down.
2)Feildn is still a good, hard working prop, he might not seem to have the same effect, but he is still a top prop IMO

=redCut it out. Carlos.

When saints signed JC he was rated one of top 3 props in the world and was awesome for us until he got injured.

Just think how good he and graham would have been? both 80 min props.

For a man of his size, he was pretty $hite.. Thats all I'll add.
Loads of salary wasted on him.
We signed the wrong brother AGAIN

FFS, you are clueless.

The man's career is in tatters and you don't think he's bothered?

And you don't read posts.

Go read the post I was replying to and my post again and then try and summon up an intelligent post yourself, if you can manage it. I will then give consideration to answering you. Meantime, go play with yourself.

I read it, you said he's not as bothered as us because he gets paid where as the fans are a player down all year.

That's as ridiculous as most of your posts. Care to correct my mistake?

Here's the conversation, petal:


Now, where do I say he is not as bothered as us? I say 'I wouldn't have thought so'. Not quite the categorical statement you are suggesting. I could go into a full linguistic analysis of my post but I can't be bothered. You are clearly bored and need to have a little nitpick to reassure the world that you don't have a small willy. I'm not going to indulge you.

The one guy we have never repaced is "Baloo" - big meaty prop who can cut it in winter conditions as well as summer.

And you say I'm nit-picking!

One thing's for sure, I wouldn't have thought that a "suppporter" who openly admitted they wouldn't watch the Leeds game because they thought we'd lose is more bothered about a player's season (and possibly career) ending injury than the player himself.