Little rumblings have surfaced since Longy's announcement he is speaking to other clubs.

One, Saints are happy for Long to go, and are looking to bring our old friend Terry in to help ease the slow down/retirement of KC.

Only a rumbling, and unlike Gidders, I am not cock sure about it's truth, but I trust who it has come from to be accurate.

I've heard this, but i very much doubt its going to happen

Terry Newton is out of contract at the end of the season.

Roby can play scrum half, so i know it seems ridiculous but stranger things have happened.

whether you like him or not Newton is still a quality player.

I'd rather have moore back, or did you mean newton and moore interchanging?

Having Newton at Saints would be a great acquisition.

no matey.

moore is not good enough, lets be fair he has not proved to be etter than Newton has he.

Strange, I got told last Friday that he had agreed a two year deal with Wigan.

I doubt either of the rumours are correct.

Hated the fella after the play off game years ago, but interestingly he'd probably be a good signing for us.

No it would'nt!

He aint done anything of note for two years, is extremly overweight and as lost his hardness. Oh and he never wins grand finals.

Thats because of Bradford going backwards
Him, Deacon and Burgess are the only ones to have performed consistently(ish)

He hasn't, but i hav'nt given up on him. I dont like the idea of moving roby, he can play in the halves but is best where he is.

NO NO NO! to Newton.

Was a fine player who sadly sullied his reputation through acts of downright thuggish behaviour on the pitch

Past his best now and is 31 years old this year, so lets be honest its a none starter IMO

At this stage Scott Moore is looking like the ideal candidate to follow in KCs footsteps unless the coach decides to go with the single hooker option and play Roby for 80 minutes.

Ive watched Bradford many times on Sky and Newton as done nothing! Even Stevo doesent cream himself over Terry anymore. He is a spent force.

BTW im no Newton hater either, he was a very good player on his day but not anymore. Rather have Scott Moore anyday.

I agree over newton, and moore could help us keep roby as the impact player he is.

Newton

You lot are idiots.

Moore is outplaying him comfortably and is young and enthusiastic. Newton looks overweight and completely oblivious to whats going on around him.

So we're getting rid of Matt Gidley, KC and Sean Long and signing Terry effing Newton. You lot really do take le biscuit.

I'd still boo him even if he played for us. Scapegoatcity.

(It must be a wind up surely?)

surely our chairman wouldn't sign someone who cost us the league in 2005? Fair few quid missed out on there and i bet sir mac is still not happy about that

Biggest load of bult ever.
[size=150=redFACT[/size.

But not as well as Eastmond.
I can't see the point of having all three of KC, JR and TN on the squad.

there is absolutely no way on this earth that st helens r.l.f.c would ever entertain the idea of moving for terry newton(*spit*)




scott moore will do a far better job for a lot longer i.m.o

Sorry Ski but to suggest Saints would sign Newton instead of Moore is, well, nonsense.

Surprised you even bothered to post it.

I think its fair to say that if we sign Terry Newton, I wont be renewing my season ticket next year.

Having spoken to him a few times, he's actually a really nice bloke.

What's in the past is in the past. If we cared about the reputations earned by either current players or players that we've signed, we wouldn't be cheering on a few of our big stars. That said, he's got his best years behind him, and any move for a 31 year old, unless they're genuinely world class, is a big-a mistake-a to make-a.

Haha. Yeah, okay.

having spoken to him a few times, he is a complete c**t.

I couldnt give a f@ck if he was the nicest thing since sliced bread off the field, I dont want that "hasbeen" at our club, when weve the likes of Roby, Scotty Moore and even Eastmond that could do a job at Nine IF the king retires.