Roby has been charged with Grade A offence from the RFL.

[urlhttp://twitter.com/#!/RLSuperLeague/status/98078337867591681[/url

Doesn't mean he'll be banned. Grade As are often given cautions and/or fines.

Hope so

St Helens vs Hull KR - "dangerous throw" from Hull KR player - No Charge, caution given. www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?3000 Castleford vs St Helens - "dangerous throw" from St Helens player - Charge.......

St Helens vs Hull KR - "dangerous throw" from Hull KR player - No Charge, caution given. www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?3000 Castleford vs St Helens - "dangerous throw" from St Helens player - Charge.......

If Saints have any nous about them at all they will simply cite precedent: Rangi Chase had his two match ban - for punching a player while on the floor - reduced to a one match ban due to his exemplary record. The RFL would be open to a legal case if Roby's exemplary record wasn't similarly treated.

can see roby getting a match ban even with is good record but saints will appeal and he get off with a fine

Has anyone seen the event?

The Cas fans I know did not seam to make too much of it, but where a bit put out cause Rangi got a sin bin in the same match.

Yes it was a two man tackle with Scott Moore. Roby lifts the Castleford player but puts him down landing on upper back. Crowd shouted a bit, as is normal when a player is lifted over horizontal, and referee felt it needed to be put on report to compensate. Was no worse than the No Charge which Blake Green of Hull KR received when they played us at home two weeks ago.

You really are a whopper sometimes.

When is the hearing?

I honestly cant see them banning him..

Surely the RFL will want the best players like Roby and Tomkins etc playing on national TV to publicise Rugby League..

According to the RFL's own disciplinary criteria, good conduct is taken into account. It was taken into account in Chase's case and should be in Roby's, which was my point. And I really don't see why such a point should elicit an insult from you, other than you insult because you have nothing remotely intelligent or vaguely interesting to say.

Found guilty.

£300 fine, no ban.

Who knows.

All anyone can ask, is they are consistent. If that means a ban then it should be a ban. It's the lack of consistency that gets everyone's back up.

They should judge the offence in the same manner they have all year.

As has already been pointed out by example, though, they aren't consistent.

Its a joke Green on Wilkin last week was worse

As it's been given a Grade A and with no previous I really can't see a ban. (bugger)

I'm considerably more worried about Saturday than I was about the Dire game. You owe us one and I fear we may get it on Saturday. Key will be how fit and up to the pace of a big game Pryce is.

That's the big problem with these peanuts

Totally agree.

Don't worry both Saints and Pryce will be up for it.

Quote ="St pete"That's the big problem with these peanuts'" I agree, although I never saw the incident with Roby I doubt it would have been intentional. But for a laugh read this from a hearing about Ryan BAiley and the punch up at HUdds. Read it all the way down to the bottom it's worth a laugh from what the committee say a bout his previous conduct www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?2554

Quote ="St pete"That's the big problem with these peanuts'" I agree, although I never saw the incident with Roby I doubt it would have been intentional. But for a laugh read this from a hearing about Ryan BAiley and the punch up at HUdds. Read it all the way down to the bottom it's worth a laugh from what the committee say a bout his previous conduct www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?2554

Spot on.

And, as such, he should get a sternly worded letter.

When is he up?

Noticed someone up for contact on Roby too

Who's on the disciplinary committee these days ?

Is Phil Clarke's dad (Colin) still on it ?