As above. saintsrlfc.com/news/page/693 Thoughts?

As above. saintsrlfc.com/news/page/693 Thoughts?

Quote =".Alice."As above. saintsrlfc.com/news/page/693 Thoughts?'" Well i for one will not be watching any saints teams that contain eastmond,(*(&^^&^&%$%).

Quote =".Alice."As above. saintsrlfc.com/news/page/693 Thoughts?'" Well i for one will not be watching any saints teams that contain eastmond,(*(&^^&^&%$%).

That's a great attitude. Not.

as long as he never plays in the squad again, I don't care really.

If he plays then, I doubt i'll bother watching as he is taking a space away from someone who MATTERS in the team.

What should we do pat the runt on the back and say dont do it again,
fwiw this is from a season ticket holdcer from 1966 to date,i hate his attitude that much,
so dont try to patronise me.

I suppose that just because the suspension is lifted - it doesnt mean that the coach has to pick him - there are enough precidents in Aus where someone has announced they are leaving only to find themselves not picked - Bulldogs did it to Willie Talau when he signed for us.

His position is untenable.

Not patronising you in the slightest, just putting my opinion across. I dislike Kyle's attitude with a passion, and think that as Sadfish said, he is taking the space of a player that actually deserves and respects the shirt they play in.

But, that said - I couldn't bring myself to turn my back on the club even if Eastmond does play for us again... which I highly doubt he will anyway.

I thought this would be the result - bit messy as I think his position is untenable in the side as basically this guilty verdict means he DID (in the mind of the club) make gestures to us, the fans.

With that in mind, I don't want to see him a red vee again - be it first team or lower.

I also think sitting him out for the rest of the year, even though not suspended, sends a very powerful message to other players at the club that we will not stand for being messed around by egos when there are young lads waiting to give their heart and soul to the club.

If Eastmond does play again and fans make obscene remarks and/or gestures towards him will they be barred from the ground?

Personally I dont want to see the little rat in a Saints jersey again. If were stuck with him let him rot and train on his own.

Leave him out of the squad and sit him just behind the bench to let him watch the players that give a toss.

What like Eastmond is?

Absolutely the worst possible outcome for us.

The over the top, very childish reaction by the fans means we lose a very dangerous player from the squad but also we don't save on his salary or have any room to sign some much needed cover because Kyle hasn't done anything serious enough to warrant being sacked.

Perfection for Kyle and his advisors as he now gets paid to do nothing for 8 months or so. Lucky sod.

Not making use of Kyle's pace in our outside backs would be a big mistake IMO given how poor they are in comparison to the big two W's.

Dont bite ....

demote the little upstart to selling hot dogs and burgers from the van.
he's not fit to wear the saints shirt ever again.

His position is pretty much untenable now in relation to playing 1st team again unless we have a major injury crisis, and I personally would not like him sat in the reserves as he would poison the atmosphere there.

I wonder what the position is in relation to him doing other jobs in the club? Opening post, etc? I'm employed in a certain role, but I know that my employer could shift me to another job at any time. He wants paying to the end of his contract, I don't see why he should be able to be sat on his doing nothing until Bath want him. He could always resign, but that would mean no payment from us.

As a season ticket holder I will also cancel my 5 year ticket if Eastmond gets picked over either Gaskell or Lomax.

I am not being ripped off by a little over ego dwarf!

Rogues not fishing you no aswell as anyone that it's a completly different story when a player abuses the crowd. I work in Retail and I get spoken to like crap! If I do the same I would get disciplined, it's as simple as that.

He should be made to play for the under 20's He should be made to fight for his place back in the first team and as long as the two we have there at present are on form etc. then there is no place for him. I just hope it doesn't affect the morale of the team.

If your talking about the Kyle Eastmond who used to put in the effort then not playing him would be foolish as he is obviously a very talented lad but the Ea$tmond we've seen since he's decided he's leaving for Union is not worth a spot on the bench for the u20's.


Kyle might think he's lucky but if Saints force him to train alone he will be very out of sorts when he finally gets a chance in union sometime in november ...

Perhaps you should let the club know how you feel and what you intend to do about it.

Why shouldn't he play?

Well, so far, he's been crap. Other players such as Gaskell and Lomax have tried hard and played better than Eastmond did. If our selection is based on merit and not on names, then Eastmond shouldn't start, irrespective of the suspension.

.........up to RS obviously but ounds like the majority don't want him to play, that being said that if he does play and scores a hat-trick then all's forgotten. Bit like Rooney at ManU in some ways, couldn't stand it if he kissed the badge

though

well saddened you tell us why he should then?

Now i know this is silly but lets just supose, oh lets see that the other players actully dont want to play with him,how would picking him benifit the team?