[urlhttp://www.superleague.co.uk/article.php?id=21471[/url
He's been refferred to the dis committee.

If true then a ban is deserved.

I remember Sinfield being hurt in a tackle, and the two having words on the floor before the PTB.

Sure it will have been accidental but a ban is due if guilty.

I'm sure the goons will be bidding for him in due course.

Moore was a bit feisty on Saturday, it has to be said! Damn shame if he is found guilty as it means I can't take the mick out of Wigan anymore!

But if he did what he has been charged with then he deserves his punishment.

I'll have to watch the video back, to see if there is anything in it.

He'll be missed though, if he cops a ban. I though his utility showed well in the Leeds game and he showed a lot of experience in order to support Gaskell and Lomax with a range of skills and plays. I've been critical of him in the past.

typical red hall don't like yorshire teams beat specially leeds. As for it being on sinfield he diserves it the cheap shot merchant.

I agree. He'd been paying attention at training I think as he made some great passes, tackled hard (although he does always do that) and as you say, supported our halfbacks really nicely.

My, the RFL have totally turned around this season haven't they?

Don't remember the ref getting involved in Moore and sinfields handbags. This come up after review or sinfield makin a Wilkinesk complaint??

0/10 Poor attempt

It's just been on Sky Sports News.

He wraps his legs around Sinfields legs to bring him down, nothing a lot of players don't do every week.

Time to rewatch the 74th minute on replay when the kids have gone to bed.

Just watched it. It would take quite an argument to convince me it was intentional - doesn't mean Moore didn't know what he was doing, but proving it's a different matter.

total accident, if Moore was to get a ban for that tackle Wigan and Leeds wouldn`t be able to field a team most weeks.

I doubt there would be anything made of this, just watched it and to be honest in full speed, it's hard to see, you just see Sinfield Grimace in pain, give Moore a look and Moore does not have a clue.

When you watch it then frame by frame, Moore is ontop of Sinfield as he gets the ball. Almost the next frame his arms are wrapped around Sinfields arms and the ball trapping it. Sinfield strains forward, Moore has one foot on the ground and the other still on the move from the momentum of the tackle. Moore plants both feet on the ground, he does not wrap them or cross them around Sinfield's legs. Roby comes in to tackle on the other side and Sinfields legs bend in an un-natural way against Moores hip/groin area.

Nothing in it at all that was intensional or milicious. Just a good ball and all tackle with 2 men in that when wrong, there was no tightening of legs or arms to apply pressure after or during the tackle. It was just a bad fall.

Well when they review the tackle they will also see that Sinfoeld attempts to elbow Moore. Another incident missed was when Webb attempted to headbutt one of our guys when getting up from a tackle. All the usual things when Leeds are losing.

2 wrongs don't make a right

I remember sinfield having a go at moore from the floor, but didnt remember anything untowards. I would hope there was nothing in it.
I agree a ban is deserved if he is proven guilty though.

people always say that but then never follow through to actually tell us how many wrongs DO make a right.

8

Scott Moore Twitter:

IF Moore has said that in twitter, it shows his intelligence, I felt one match and £300 fine was fair, but if he has been so stupid then another game and increase his fine, silly boy!

Banned for tackling, what next?!

Well, obviously, we are Saints. The whole world (the RFL) are against us and the only surprise in this is that it wasnt 8 matches and a £5k fine. They must have all had a nice breakfast this morning.

/impression of a Wigan fan.