What do people think of him?

I have seen nothing thus far to suggest he is any better than when he left 3 years ago.Poor again today

IMO he is suffering from being shoehorned into the side at loose forward, for me Roby is a more natural LF than him and SM a better hooker.

I don't think it's fair to judge the Prince until the King has left the building.

never rated him at hudds last season still dont rate him this season either

He should never have been loose forward in that game in those conditions. Roby should have been loose forward if wilkin was playing stand off.

I would have liked to see pryce moved to stand off in the 2nd half with kyle going to fullback and moore to scrumhalf. We needed to change something at halftime and getting the ball in leons hand more would have been a good idea imo.

Agree, Scott Moore secondary position should be scrum half and likewise James Roby at Loose Forward. Don,t think Leon Pyrce at full back worked for us on Friday. Thought Wigoons were smart and kept Pyrce and Eastmond well under control.

I was pretty shocked that potter didn't change it just after halftime. When chasing the game like we was we neeeded kyle, leon and roby with ball in hand as often as possible.

I would have started with Fozzard with Puletua in the second row and Flannery at loose forward, Scott Moore is a hooker.

Foz should have played without a doubt

He isn't a back rower that's for sure. He didn't have his best game, but I think he's a good player when played at hooker.

He's solid when playing at dummy half, but at #13 yesterday, I didn't really see him get involved too much.

brilliant first half of season at hudds

very ordinary 2nd half and didnt look intrested

best played at hooker

wouldnt have him back at hudds now with lunt and robinson here

Too early to say. He still needs time to get to grips with Saints' patterns of play. I know he's been with the club on-and-off for some time, but he's never had an extended run in the first team. Being played out of position won't help him in the short term. As has been stated - he needs the opportunity to develop in whatever role Potter has earmarked for him.

Moore does give us options. And that's no bad thing. His distribution is better than Roby's. He can kick (a hefty distance) and has good physical presence (useful when the big packs come knocking at the door). He makes the odd mistake, but you can put at least some of that down to youthful exuberance and inexperience.

Not good enough,makes waaaay too many errors every time he plays.

James Lowes made "too many errors" when he was a young and inexperienced player finding his way. Leeds thought processes lined up with yours - and he rubbed their noses in it for the best part of ten years.

As stated: Too early to say.

I would go as far to say that his distribution from dummy half is the best in the team. It's by far his biggest asset, and something we have maybe lacked a little since Cunningham injured his elbow.

It's amazing though, we lose a game and suddenly every player is not good enough.

yep looks like scotts the scapegoat for this week

Hes not a young lad anymore. This is his 3rd season in the top flight. As mentioned above, he had a good first half of the season last year, poor second half.

I've noticed that. How dumb is it?

Nothing wrong with Scott's contribution yesterday. I do wish Potter would play him consistently at hooker though, so he will have the chance to learn his trade in good time for the King's retirement.

I've wondered about that turnaround. It coincided with his rollocking from the boss over his post Challenge Cup celebrations didn't it? It certainly seemed to anyway.

He may not develop any further but I'm hoping he will get the chance to develop as much as he is able to by actually playing in the position this season that he is supposed to be making his own next season.

He's in his 3rd season, but as far as FIRST TEAM game time as a SENIOR and ST. HELENS player goes he's still a rookie.

There was a massive difference in his performances after his post cup final antics. Brought on himself but he was a young lad and he has hopefully learnt his lesson and will kick on from here.

I thought as much. He probably felt ostracised or something following the rollocking he got. No wonder he was enthusiastic about his return to Saints!

I think he was embarrassed more than anything. It didnt come out for a couple of weeks so when he was rumbled he had been lying to his coach and team mates.

We have Lunt who in my opinion will be the best number 9 in super league next year (when Cunningham retires) and Robinson has made the switch so I am more than happy for Moore to return to Saints.

I've got a mate from Leigh who was out on Thursday evening...