Pretty sure that the players, coach, chairman and CEO disagree in regards to his leadership. Few of the younger players will certainly disagree.

That's one side of his game that can't be criticised, despite the performances and results of late.

I agree, I don't think there's a particular perfect role that we can fit him in to. Unfortunately, with the team as it is, he has to play at the moment and I think that may be the best compromise. The only issue is it lightens up our pack and if Wilkin also plays at second row we may get bullied up front.

Again, this.



for me, right now it's a straight choice between Wilkin and wellens if/when wellens plays in the back row, and given we need wellens in the team right now, Wilkin can either be interchanged with him, or sits out for a few weeks. I'm struggling at the moment with Wilkin at the moment, his defensive read led to the first Huddersfield try, and he's consistently amongst the top tackles missed - he was in great form up until Wakefield where he got banned, and is starting to make some great breaks though

I think we can start Wilkin on the bench and bring him on for Wellens after 20 mins. I think it's important that Wellens is on at the start of each half to make sure we start at the right pace and intensity.

I reckon Wello needs to play at least 60 mins in every game to keep the team focused, if somehow we can get Wello operating at full back when defending and Lomax at full back when attacking that might be worth a try. That would mean Jones,Lomax and Wello playing multi roles.

For me Wilkin is always in the starting 13, he's an intelligent all rounder who can take some pressure off the half backs. He's always up at the top end of the tacklers so he will miss a few in the stats, he is also one of our best players in the team for clean breaks and try assists, besides scoring a few himself.

Roby, Wilkin and Wello are the first names on my team sheet.

I think Walsh might muscle into my top three