Quote ="Offside Monkey"So we need another prop, as well as a standoff (and scrum half, potentially).
Huby would be a very good addition, but we'll do well to pull that one off.
What to people think of Phil Joseph? I can imagine he wouldn't cost us the earth, and always seems a decent battering ram when I've seen him.
Signing another prop, say Huby for conjecture's sake, would allow us to field the following pack
Front row of Amor, Roby, Walmsley - with Masoe and Huby from the bench, covered by Richards and Walker
Back row of LMS, Soliola, Manu with Savelio from the bench, covered by Greenwood and Thompson
That's a big pack.'"
I like Huby - a classic case of a prop maturing late into effectiveness. I remember when I first started watching, people used to say that props don't enter their prime till they're past 30; how times change. I'm less keen on Joseph, who seems championship standard to me. I'd hope Saints have scouts looking at championship clubs to see if there are any big, nasty props - even in the latter stages of their careers, who could come and smash into brick walls at Saints for a bit. I do think prop is a position which can benefit from a bit of the older man's confidence and maturity. It's a rare 20-year-old who has the self-confidence to do what good props do well. That's why James Graham was such a standout.
I think we've already got 4 big powerful props : Walmsley, Amor, Masoe and Savelio. Then we have youthful cover in Beaumont, Forster, Greenwood and Walker. I don't see any reason to play LMS at prop with those options. Give the lad space, and stop asking him to do what he's never really been able to do.