It's true tommy 1 paul is 6

I have done so. I ended it.

I wasn't even remotely saying that. I actually said that if Makinson plays I hope he has a stormer. So how is that saying what you are suggesting I said? People on here like to twist my words to suit their own silly games but you have just taken it to a new level. You've completely made something up!

You did say you hope he had a stormer . . . . then said:



Thereby saying the reason he's unlikely to have a stormer is because Brown didn't pick him to play there last week.

If you weren't saying that, what were you saying?

I was saying exactly what I said and I didn't ever say I thought he wouldn't have a stormer. You've made that bit up from scratch.

Stop trying to stir up an argument that just doesn't exist.

Actually, having read your post again I can see I might have misinterpreted (talking about likelihood of him playing at fullback rather than likelihood of having a stormer).

So hands up and apols!