HMM didnt some one else grabb a ref other week,, cant seem to rember who now,,, nothing was said about that,,,, eye gouging was changed to alleged eye goughing,,,drugs ok guilty...hes a bad boy of rugby all sports have them.. if we didnt i dont think half the people would watch rugby league tbh .let play slap n tickle instead now eh ,,and if hes the first one to throw a balll into the crowd and get banned for it well i dont know what its comming to,, firstly did he aim it at this so called fan ???? i think not,, not saying its right,, but sam does all the time, as does charnley as does so many others,, but because its HOCK.. its wrong,,, unless you only had one fan behind the sticks,, i find this very hard to belive he did it on purpose to hurt some one lol

I'm not telling you anything. I don't want to see you.

Boring me now, was funny at first but bored now.

I think he was silly, you think he wasn't. I don't want him banned as you've suggested I just stated how he lets himself down.

We don't agree, so let's end it here before you end up banned.

At last some common sense on this topic.

The fans' anger was directed towards the referee at that instant far, far more than it was at Hock. The referee needs to be banned, not Hock. It's a non-incident. Forget it and move on.

i did say this thread should be closed a few messages back my friend,, i did say it was gettin boring to,,so ill keep your wish and say no more on the subject,,im sure we,ll have a few more debates in our time,,keep up the good work st pete,, as arnie used to say,, unless im bannded,,, I,LL BE BACK