What? Because I dare to question your myopic view of Saints? I hate to break this to you, and it may surprise you, but your not always right.

If he did that in an England shirt the cretin Inverdale and his ra ra mates would have exploded in their pants and he'd be proclaimed as the worlds greatest Rugby player

I doubt he'll ever wear a England shirt.

There's a real positive come out of this whole sorry mess.

When the saga first began, the thought of losing Eastmond was horrible - he was the future, he was our poster boy, he was going to set the new stadium alight.

Now we're all clamouring for J-Lo to regain his fitness, because he genuinely brings more to the table. Suddenly the loss of Eastmond isn't quite the disaster for Saints we originally thought.

The Eastmond that played well for Saints and England is a massive loss to us regardless of the emergence of J-Lo (having both would be greedy but good

), the loss of the shell of a player we have at the moment is actually bonus because all he's doing is taking up valuable cap space.

Lomax's emergence is extremely welcome. But let's not delude ourselves. We are very fortunate that RU chose to poach from a position that we can cover. Had it been another where replacements are thin on the ground we'd be up the creek.