He hasnt played in the last 2 games anyway. No doubting he's a miss, but we should have adequate cover.

yeah i agree that mick is a little bit surplus to requirements when your squad is fully fit, my assumption was that lomax was still injured. sorry about that! his disgruntled nature yesterday sort of said that he was in contention for the squad on saturday!

on which note... just seen the interview with potter and he said kyle is very doubtful, and lomax is a little more of a chance!

Kyle should be nowhere near the pitch on Saturday. If Potter takes that risk again he is an idiot. He was an idiot for taking it on Friday and it was only Cunningham who saved us from defeat.

Lomax should only play if he is properly fit, ie not like Kyle but able to play and play well for a full 80 minutes.

Otherwise, we should just go with what we had against Warrington and see what we can do. I don't hold out a lot of hope but if we manage to maintain the fighting spirit and everyone plays at the top of their game then a win is possible.

If its a choice between a half fit Eastmond and a half fit Lomax, I'd go with Lomax, seeing as a half fit Eastmond last week was tantamount to playing with 12 men.

I agree with both of the above posts! And I feel that last week the commentators hit the nail on the head saying kyle was nowhere near the game! He stayed away as much as he could! And for me! I'd much rather have a player like scott or indeed jonny, who would be more fit and more willing to get involved! Kyle when injured seems to be a liability! And he showed that with his swinging arm! Looked horrible! Even though he missed!