oh never mind

I agree.

I was less than impressed with Handley.
Is Sutcliffe still injured? If not he should be back in the centre next week.

Yep, Sutcliffe is out for a few weeks. Peteru and Singleton are the only players with a chance of returning next week.

Played predominantly rubbish but still lost by only one point to Hull away, who themselves acted like they'd won a Grand Final.

Go figure.

Really? I saw no presentation of a trophy. But I guess, if you were there at the game, you didnt see anything post match given the away section of the ground was just about empty when the final hooter sounded

72 seconds from the end was when the first leeds fan left the ground....and that was me.not used to seeing us win at hull...o wait.

You probably need a new watch!!

really? acted like we won a Grand Final?

the video ref gifted you a try. Accept it, you lost, stop being a Whino.

in the end we've lost 3 games to our nearest rivals and all 3 by just a point
once the pack is in full health hopefully we can turn those around but the league will be very close this year and all the top teams can and will beat each other

I think we're all fed up of the officials. Different rules every game.

Really not THAT bothered.

Played badly and lost to Cas and Dull; butchered a lead Vs Wigan to lose - all by a point and drew with Hudds.

We have had a fair few forwards missing and our biggest loss was vs Widnes after a trip to Australia.

I think that about says it all.

You win nothing in the regular season. Make sure you're in the Top 8 and you have a chance. As well know all too well.

Enjoy your ' We beat the champions' trophy chaps.

nobody is calling beating the GF cheats a "trophy"

Care to explain how we cheated the GF?

time this Collinson troll was warned at least

Stick to Trawling elsewhere D#*# Head.

Nearly 1300 posts & the first time you've said something sensible. Cas were cheated. Obvs.

Not cheated more embarrassed

How would you like it if we said the Hull team that won the GF were cheats? Oh no, wait...

Don't want to set the team warning debate off again, but on the subject of the rules. A few times in hull game and indeed every TV game the ref goes upstairs to check if a try is scored when an attacking player is either held up over the line or short. Often the attacking player knows he has not scored and goes back 10 yards ready to play the ball but there is along break whilst video ref looks at 5 angles. Could this be changed where the ref asks the attacker do you want me to look at video evidence. If he says no the game goes on and the defending are not given a rest/chance to regroup. Just a thought re. How we could reduce the number of stoppages.

Scrap the video referee. It's that easy.

imo thought it was a good game, both teams tackled well and the game could have gone either way, thought for long spells we where the better team but fair play to you guys, you wont be far off at the end of the season, whats happened to Briscoe? he looked awful at times,parcell is class and don't know where jjb gets his energy,

And you call people out for trolling in Sin Bin threads ... laughable!

But how long would the warning last? And if he lashes out in the act of scoring, would it result in a ban?

I know what you mean but can't imagine how many wrong decisions would get made in the big games (appreciate some appear wrong even with it).