I'm with you DHM - Often the highlight of the match was the final whistle and the race to get the player's tie ups. They had that linament smell you couldn't find elsewhere. Ah yes, those were the days.

Then Joe Lydon ted some supporter (probably with justification) and it all came to an abrupt end. Sad times.

Good. Their details are above. Write to them and tell them how. I'm sure your ideas haven't already been considered in the numerous meetings and forums.

And again. The "club" does NOT run the stadium.

OK, so you don't need my brass then. For the best as you won't be getting it.


Not in the slightest. I simply have no desire to travel to Hull anyway and subject myself to the experience of a couple of hours in the vicinity of the kind of individuals that inhabit the stand nearest away supporters. It doesn't upset me. I actually prefer watching away games in the pub or at home. It's a lot nicer. The people there have higher IQs and the beer is better.

If you ever do want or need my money (and the money of money other like minded visiting fans) you might want to do something to tempt me there. I have had a PM from someone suggesting you might be doing just that. Glad those that run the club are not as blase as you. Good news.

[uI[/u had no idea you were going to give me any!?



Fair enough.



Hull are a pro-active club. It wouldn't surprise me if they did take further action. It has been discussed enough.

If you had managed to grasp what I have been trying to tell you for the last two hours, you would have realised that.

Incidentally. Why do you keep referring to me as if I'm an official representative of the SMC? For the record, I'm not. "You will not be getting my money", so on so forth...

I will say again, as you have made the same mistake. SMC run the stadium. Not the club. Although, SMC do obviously take on Hull FC, Hull City and other users of the facilities opinions.

Feel free to continue pontificating on alleged incidents at a game you did not attend. And watch out for all those red herrings you seem so keen on liberally scattering around... you'll slip on them eventually.

like the professionals at wembley who couldnt stop the discraceful incidents with leeds and warrington idiots fighting in the corner and pubs after

pot kettle black me thinks !
id worry about your own back yard

I'd love Wembley to be our back yard. But I'm happy to have it as Old Trafford for the moment.

I've read some crap before, but this takes the mick. I'll pick out some examples and just ridicule them one at a time:

1. "Make that stand the family stand". How would that work? The West Stand is the family stand. If we make the East Stand the family stand, they'll all just go into the West Stand! If we make them both family stands, then where do we put all the people that haven't come with their family? And why would any family want to sit in the corner closest to the away supporters so they can be abused by the idiot minorities of Leeds, Rovers, etc? Your not all spring chickens yourself, you know.

2. "Just move them to the other side". It's unreserved FFS! How do you propose they do that? They pay for a season ticket, they can sit in the unreserved sections of the stand.

3 "Ban them". What have they done that chavs at other clubs such as yours haven't done? If they fight, they get ejected. If they entered the field, they get ejected.

Stop being over the top.

I shall whilst you feel free to pontificate on incidents you claim not to have seen. Or were you doing an "Arsene Wenger" on this issue?

By all means glibly dismiss the multiple laws broken by virtue of the physical assault on Donald because it suits your agenda in relation to said player. If you're willing to do that it's not such a massive leap to assume you'd dismiss the chants aimed at Gareth Thomas if you had an agenda with him.

1.Agreed

2. There is talk of the East Stand being all reserved seats for next season which would certainly help identify the troublemakers.

3. Of course they should be banned, whoever they support. Why shouldn't they?

If we're going by majority opinions, that makes Hull fans thugs. Agreed?

The majority of opinion is that every club in SL has its "thug" element.

And the winner of Knucklehead post of the tread is "Clearwing"

And the winner of Knucklehead post of the thread is "Clearwing"

Still, at least he knows how to only make one post at a time eh?

Reserved seating will do absolutely nothing to help identify them. Ask any police officer. CCTV, which is already in place does far far more.

Banning people should be reserved for serious offences, not the odd act of idiocy.

- Entering the field of play, getting hold of a player - ban.
- Scrapping, ejected.
- Moment of stupidity, missle throwing etc, ejected, serious warning.
- Persistent trouble making, ban.

Hitting me on my posting skills. That just hurts. Here let me sepll a word incorrectly for you as well.

Just a reminder that taking the high ground gives you further to fall...

Let's hope so

www.hullfc.com/hullfc/contents/? ... m=facebook To all you who say Hull are doing nothing, at least its a start.

www.hullfc.com/hullfc/contents/? ... m=facebook To all you who say Hull are doing nothing, at least its a start.

And it's to be applauded but will it go far enough?
And i suppose 8yrs late is better than nothing.

I take it you mean about chav corner and not the alchol? They only introduced being able to drink in the seats this season. Personally I think if you can't go 40 mins without a beer (asuming you have one at half time) then you should stay at home. On the other hand my hubby likes a pint now and again and it will last him most of the first half, so once again minority of idiots who can't hold their beer spoiling it.

A bit of both if you can't attend a RL match without acting like a sc#mbag and i include scrapping,throwing missiles and pitch invasions then you should'nt be allowed to attend full stop.
I don't give a flying one if they claim taunts ,self defence etc etc a zero tolerance policy is the only way to go imo and IF you receive a club fine and it impacts your junior development then the chavs etc only have themselves to blame along with the "fans" who know who they are and don't shop them.

And that's annoying. On balance I'm quite happy to not have the beer for the afternoon, given that I can happily live without beer, if it stops the numbskullery. It is, however, sad if people can't enjoy a pint with the game (although few grounds serve a pint you could "enjoy" anyway) because of a minority (actually quite a large one) of idiots.

The trouble is, I'm not sure it works. Said idiots are usually pretty well oiled when they arrive at the ground anyway.

As for the chav corner's offences not being ban-able. I don't agree. Most places with decent stewarding (not many RL grounds) if someone is acting like a kn0b, jumping around making gestures and being abusive, they get politely warned that they need to modify their behaviour if they wish to remain on the premises. If they don't modify their behaviour, they get removed. The same can be applied to chav corner (and it's equivalent at other grounds), particularly over the course of a season.

so fighting, and possibly causing injury to someone, and chucking a missile which may blind someone should only mean being ejected?



that to me condones those offences