glad to see our resident laughing stock makes a bigger A$$ of himself on a daily basis!

Keep it up flop! keep it up!

Wigan were the better team, Leeds defence was good but it had to be, don't try claim Leeds were the better team though, but ATEOTD it's Leeds who are in hat for next round

So you think Leeds were the better team? glad to see the Whino tinted specs haven't fallen off your swede yet then

Aww,bless! Huddersfield fans riding the coat-tails of Wigan! We've finished with you. You had your 15 minutes and now your star is fading - rapidly! Wigan,Wire,Saints and even Hull are on the radar now. You once made a 'blip' but have now disappeared into the Bermuda Triangle of Super League mediocrity. So long old friend!

Yes we were the better team because we scored a matching winning try whilst Wigan couldnt!

Only a idiot would suggest a team that goes 80 mins without conceeding a try against the team with the best attacking record, whilst scoring against a team with the second best defensive record in the comp wasn't the better team!

you are bitter, you are sour, you long for us to fail! You are a crap troll who repeatedly looks like a numty!

How can you talk about rhino tinted specs when you have the biggest pair!

you need to get over it flop!

Everyone does it so it's ok? Your not allowed to kick out let alone kick another player in the face knocking him out and giving him 8 stitches, should have been sin binned for that whether he meant it or not.



Delaney ends up on his back? No case to answer then, the tackle was just a good aggressive tackle, if he would have landed on the top of his back/neck then yes I would agree he should recieve a ban.



He should not have put himself in that position? shouldn't be jumping into a tackle like that?




clearly you have never played the game!



Peacock should have been put on report.

Senior should have been binned.

Farrell was committed.

End of chat

G

Point out where I said Leeds were the better side

I truley can't see how anyone could say we wernt The better side when our try line wasn't breached! especially when you take into account the oppossission.

Farrell was intent on charging the KICKER he made no attempt whatsoever to charge the ball and took Mcguire out whilst he was in the air.= Sin Bin no question.
Since yesterday you've posted nothing but utter bitter sh#*e get over it you were beaten and you weren't allowed to let your usual spoiling tactics take over the game.
Also whilst we are at it as unfortunate it was that J tompkins caught a stray boot that lad needs to watch his knees in the tackle also every match at least a couple times he puts his knees in and yesterday did it to Buderus but got away with it,great player but no angel.

We were mate,Flying poop shouldn't be even discussing a CC game and should stay on the Road to obscurity ala the Giants!

Or as bas as coley's spear tackle on Delaney

If McGuire had held onto the ball 1 second longer the tackle would have been legit and it would have been a turnover. He got sin binned for a late hit, which is incorrect by the rules as he was committed to the tackle.

Both players were in mid air when Farrell hit him though you can't tackle a man in the air nor can you hit the kicker late so the sin bin was correct.

This is utter rubbish. Being committed to the tackle has absolutely nothing to do with the decision. Think about it - if being committed while making a tackle, no matter how late, meant that you couldn't be carded then it would be open season on anyone putting boot to ball.

But if you can post the relevant rule that says otherwise I'll happily admit to being wrong.

The spear was bad yes, and was dealt with in the correct way by the ref, not sure what your point is?

If Liam Farrell would have not charged into McGuire then McGuire could have dummied and whipped it out wide or gained an extra 10 yeard and then kicked, he isn't going to defy the laws of physics and stop in the air 'matrix style' as soon as McGuire touches the ball with his boot is he?

Yeah Joel had his knees in, watch the replay he smashes him and his knees end up in there so he leaves them there as you would. All the Leeds players were doing it all game with elbows in faces in the tackle but that sort of thing is acceptable in my book as it is part of the game, shouldn't happen but does. Ryan Bailey high tackled Sam Tomkins on 25 mins yet nothing was said, if Cummings watches that replay and thinks Bentham was consistent then he needs his eyes testing.

If Farrell wouldn't have been sin binned an you still won I wouldn't have been bothered, I am bitter about the inconsistency of the referees decisions. I like to see a bit of biff in a game as it makes it more spicey and a better game. I don't want to see a one sided performance from the ref.

IMO if Farrell was worthy of a sin bin then Peacock and Senior were.

Our game has a way of leveling itself out so I predict Leeds will be on the wrong end of a few bad calls ending up in a loss in the near future.

I was reffering to Sgt "Rhino Specs" Wilko, see post below this as backs up his original claim that leeds the best team

He goes out to disco's in Big shoes and a Red nose!!!!

Thats a fair point and one that should be difficult to argue against




Thats also a fair point and one that is definitely difficult to argue against





Nope, can't fault that argument...

Personally thought the ref got most call spot on.

Coley - lifted above horizontal, but not intentional, just the momentum from a dominant tackle. He'd be unlucky to get more than 1 match if that
Senior - definite penalty. No more, he does have a habit if flailing about and often gives away penalties when in posession. 2 today.

Farrell - Committed to the tackle true, but the hit was late, Farrell was in the air, leading with the shoulder, and was always dangerous. Rules are very clear on that.

Peacock - First contact with shoulder. No malice, just beaten by a quick play.

It is clear that there are a lot of clueless opposition supporters, that are desperate to have any excuses in order to try and make them feel like they are better than the Rhinos. Wigan supporters should be gutted, but pleased about how well they went, they probably deserved the win, but missed out by switching off for the last minute of the game. They lost because they didn't play to the full 80, not because the world is against them.

Peacock high tackle - Penalty, lazy arm - correct decision
Tomkins no try - Smith knock on - wrong decision
Senior kick out - unintentional contact, penalty - correct decision
Farrell late challende - although commited, he drops his shoulder at last minute upon contact, he could have landed without taking Mcguire out - Penalty and sin-bin as per RFL directive - correct decision
Coley Spear - Penalty - Should be off when compared to Mounis last week, will have to answer at Red Hall - Penalty correct decision, lucky to stay on

Most importantly...

Result = Still the same as yesterday, Leeds in semi's, Wigan out....

For once I agree with this poster.

It was accidental in that he could not see who the player was, or whether his face was there or not, and therefore definatley not a sinbinning.

However, there is no doubt in doing that sort of action in the tackle, you are attempting to kick someone or something. For me the RFL need to stamp down on this sort of action as it is not needed at all. I would therefore ban Senior for a game for it, and ensure the message to all players is that you do this sort of action you get banned.

I think there's some sense in that. Struggling to get up is one thing, kicking you legs 3 or 4ft in the air is another. Send a message out with a 1 game, and work with refs on the cause as well as the symptom

WRONG It was accidental BUT reckless equals penalty.