and so unnecessary.....

No.

He's labelled someone a Nazi just because they didn't agree with his opinion.

He's had his ar5e handed to him on that alone.

Real world?

I thought you said that's how it was explained to you in a social work team?

For which he apologised.

So now ?

He'd be best just retiring quietly as that action alone completely devalues his whole argument.

Bollax

Bless

thats right! understanding reality is massive when trying to offer the best services with a lack of funds. the people who know and understand a community advise on how best to get the best services. that's who you give good services with people who really understand the area they work in! Roundhay road is lucky, it has a lot of workers who come from the area. If you didn't come from the area you were made in a massive way to understand the hardship of the people you provide services for!

Na perp! I wouldn't take notice of anything you say. your just here to niggle! Your like an STD I once had!

Oh dear. How classy.

Oh mate if it was only the first one ide had!

I new it was time to ease off when the doctor at the clap clinic said

"mr wilkinson if we see you again we might have to get you a season ticket"

sad but true. Lucky Ive settled down since then.

Thats weird, all i've seen is sgtwilko accuse someone of being wrong when they weren't, fail to accept he was wrong when he were called on it, yet at the same time, fail to give any evidence to support his poistion. I have used reasoned logic, and have backed up my points with evidence and have provided links, sgtwilko has dodged all my questions and reorted to insults. Despite all this you call me the child having the hissy fit, and when i've asked you to justify such a seemingly ridiculous statement, you've failed to do so and have simply repeated your statement. Which part of this summary dont you agree with?


Have you not read any of my posts, or did you read them and not understand them? He didnt just explain the definition of racism used at his workplace, he was specifically telling others they were wrong for using a different definition, to the one he had being taught at his workplace. Its not very hard to see this massive difference in the two - I explained this in my last post.


Thats not all you did, apparently you also didnt bother to read my last post, or didnt understand it. See the point i made above.
No, you didnt just explain about how racism works in the real world You simply defined racism differently, to another poster, and told him he was wrong because he used a definition which didnt agree with your definition.
(sorry if my responses seem a bit repetitive, he keeps churning out the same old arguments that i've already debunked, so im having to argue against the same arguments time and time again, until either he realises he is wrong, or actually starts defending his points)


Finally something we agree on. Your ability to simply not get it is astounding me. You keep trotting out the same points, as if you haven't realised /cannot comprehend the fact that, i've already defeated defeated them.


I notice that again, you have failed to answer any of my questions, or directly dispute any of the poits i've made. You dont seem to want to take my points on board, or dont seem to understand them so i'll make it simple:

You asserted that, the statement 'Anyone can be racist, it doesnt matter whether they are a part of an ethnic minority or not' is incorrect.
You have supported it by the 'fact' that: racism is oppression, and you cant oppress if you are part of the 'enpowered majority'.
This supporting evidence is based entirely on your definition of the term racism.
Can you not see how this is circular reasoning?
Your whole argument can be condensed down to: 'your statement about the definition of racism is wrong, because mine is right' (because as i've said, your supporting evidence holds, if and only if your premise (that your definition of racism is the only correct one) is true)
And as i've shown, your definition isn't supported by any of the dictionaries i've bothered to check, isnt supported by the UN or the European Parliament, and isnt supported by the majority of the public.
Im sorry but you have categorically, been proved wrong.

(The above point, in bold, is the crux of the whole argument, you cannot decide not to respond to it, without concedeing that you are wrong)

So the next time you write me a PM and apologise for something that you wrote in haste at 2am in the morning during a petty argument with another insomniac you want me to ignore it and ban you again ?

Just so I'm clear on this of course.

You're off on one again



You really don't like people who offer something different to your point of view do you ?

An academic, definitely, corduroy jacket with leather arm patches, breathes in deeply through his nose before he makes a statement, laughs at his own jokes - I've got you haven't I ?

Why break the habit of a lifetime

So you do write some thing that you regret when conversing with your insomniac friends at 2am ?

If by 'off on one again' you mean showing up you and your mate, then yes you are correct




The ditstinct lack of, any responses on your part, to any of the points i've made leads me to ask: You really dont seem to like responding to the points i raise at all, do you, why is this?

Any way, a better (and more to the point) question is, why do you think, that i dont like people who offer opinions which differ to mine? is it because you didnt bother to read my posts, or because you didnt understand them? because i specifically remember telling sgtwilko this: "Why do i argue your point? maybe it has something to do with the fact that i dont like people falsely telling others they are incorrect, there are few things more annoying to me than an ignorant 'know it all'."
So no its not me disliking people who have a differing opinion to mine, its, people telling others (from a position of ignorance) that they are wrong, when this isnt the case, which i dislike - i thought i made myself quite clear before (apparently not clear enough

)
I also dont like it when people insult me, fail to back it up, and then when i present evidence to counter their (in this case, your) petty insults, you ignore them, and continue to randomly insult me. A bit pathetic if you ask me...again, absolutely nothing to do with disliking people who disagree with me though.


Oooh what a surprise, another insult

rounds off another well thought out, informative post, which didnt at all dodge every question i asked and every point i made

"Widnes 'till i die" off on another finger wagging pontification



Its very easy to get under your skin, you really should step down off that high horse and take on board the absolute fact of life that sometimes people have a different point of view and a different life experience to you and that very fact does not automatically make them wrong, however I will not hold my breath while you grow accustomed to that life skill.

And in true Columbo style...

"Just one more thing sir..."

This post was made in the Sin Bin on May 6th this year by a Nottingham academic known as "Widnes 'till i die", using the same IP address as the person who also appears on this page...

[urlhttp://viewtopic.php?f=11&t=455601&p=15168265#p15168265[/url



...and the context of it was exactly as it appears, backed up by several other xenophobic comments by the same poster on the same thread.

How does that reconcile with the same persons views on this thread ?



One day, in the real world "Widnes 'till i die" will grow up.

Im not sure what my political views have to do with what i have posted in this thread, and im not sure why you have brought it up...oh wait, its another blatant example of an [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominemad hominem attack[/url. The old, i cant defeat your position, or anything you have said in this thread, so i'll personally attack you...well done



You think im the one who should grow up? correct me if im wrong, but throughtout this discussion, all i have done, is point out the mistakes another poster has made, in doing so I used reasoned logic, and have backed up all my points with evidence and have provided links. You decided to get involved in the discussion, only to personally insult me when i've asked you to justify such a seemingly ridiculous statement, you've failed to do so and have simply repeated your insults. You have dodged everything i have asked you, and ehave ignored every point i have made. Yet each time you respond to my posts, because you dont want to 'lose' the argument. Despite all this you think i am the child who shoud grow up??



By the way, i've realised, (and i hope others do aswell) that you bringing up an old post of mine, was not only an ad hominem attack, it was also a pathetc attempt to change the subject, (to the content of the month old post you linked to) because you know you are wrong, but cannot seem to bring yourself to admit it. Pathetic.

If only you spent as long trying to argue against the points i have made, and trying to answer the questions i have asked you, instead of trawling through my old posts trying to find something which i've said, which you think people will disagree with... Maybe then you wont look like someone desperately trying to change the subect, and avoid admitting you were wrong!

Really?
I must have missed the one where Coloumbo didnt bother to respond to what anyone had to say, completely disregareded all evidence and facts presneted, completely ignored the fact that everything of substance he said was proved to be wrong, and just went around randomly insulting people...then pulled out a random piece of 'evidence' which has nothing to do with the thing in discussion, then sat there all smug asif he'd won.

I could've sworn i'd already addressed this point... i guess i must be wrong... oh wait here it is:


Apparently you also seem to think that, i havent proven sgtwilko wrong, you must have missed all the posts like this one, in which i completely destroyed his whole argument (i even put it int bold, because even by this point i was getting sick of defeating the same point time and time again, again you seemed to have missed all of this):

Oh dear



Like I said, so easy to wind up, so easy to discover the hypocrisy of a poor troll - we've had the best on here, you were just too simple to uncover.

And I can crush grapes and rip tissues.