Why not move sinfield to hooker ?

Takes Sinfield too far away from areas where he's going to be able to do most damage with his passing and kicking game.

He's also not got the acceleration you need to play dummy half in the modern era and exploit slow or lazy markers.

Thought you were talking about Sinfield, not McShane.

Gibbersh. Just gibberish.

Not taking an issue with whatever point you're attempting to make. I can overlook typos. I don't even bring up the been and being issue any more. However that sentence is just authentic frontier gibberish.

Blazing Saddles. Question, does Gotcha live in a town where everyone is related and have the same surname? Hang on a minute, that would be Cas!

Going back to the topic, Sutcliffe has made the first steps and needs to continue his devlopment. He isn't going to do that being played out of position. Although, I accept the point that, to some extent, the positions in question are interchangeable.
One thing I did notice on Friday was that he wasn't averse to the odd cheap shot in the tackle. If he continues with that and develops further, he'll be about as popular as Bailey by this time next year.

I actually think that playing him out of position is a good move. Get him ready for the physicallity of SL, without giving him the burden of being chief playmaker. He needs to get used to being hit by big blokes, and needs to get used to the speed of play before he can start to direct it

That is one argument, the potential for unnecessary injury through over work at a young age is another. In fairness, I aren't too fussed as long as he keeps getting a game because, he has demonstrated he is worthy of a place.

I would agree.Any game time he gets from now on is a bonus as i guess he has already had as much or more than he or the club would have anticipated at the start of the year.

he's just annoyed that jimmy watson (presumably his son from his posts) didn't get a chance with Leeds.

as for vickery i hear he's been offered 4/5 times, Hunslet have turned him down every time.

From an outsider point of view, Sutcliffe is more than capable of keeping that role.
I'm a big fan of Sinfield but as already said, he'll play his role no matter what number he has.

I would say Sutcliffe is fighting with McGuire and Burrow and if Burrow goes back to hooker it is a nice set up.

No problem with letting a kid have some games off to keep him fresh but he's one of the best stand offs in the league already imho.