He just wrote this on his twitter

@Shaun_Lunt

"Thanks for all your messages of support, not one negative comment, much appreciated.. It will be released tomorrow of where I will be goin"

One poster saying Widnes on the Giants board.

I've not seen anough of Lunt to comment but would be disapointed because if we are to sign anybody it needs to be a vast improvement on what we have. This year as many were shouting when Mcshane and hood weren't previously getting gametime was all about them trying to establish themselves and here you are writing them off. For what it's worth I think Mcshane as he gets more time is going Ok and as a lot more to offer as the confidence grows and the same for Hood.

That would make more sense as I still don't believe he's coming to us as I can't see we have a need for another hooker and IF he does end up here on loan with a view to a permanent signing then that surely has to spell the death knell for one of McShane or Hood which given the vote of confidence both have been given I just don't think the Lunt signing is going to happen.

I agree Lunt is a good young player and is commensurate with my mantra that if a player becomes available - at the right price - and he is better than what we already have (in this case, McShane) then he should be signed. However, I too find it strangely contradictory to the long term deals both incumbent rakes were recently given: to send one out on loan would then smack of a cruel debilitating lack of faith from the club in that player.

Time will tell I guess.

Confirmed: www.therhinos.co.uk/news/19127.php? I thinks Hudds are mad (moore is probably a better player but can't see how he's worth the gamble given his issues)

Confirmed: www.therhinos.co.uk/news/19127.php? I thinks Hudds are mad (moore is probably a better player but can't see how he's worth the gamble given his issues)

Quote ="Omar Little"Confirmed: www.therhinos.co.uk/news/19127.php? I thinks Hudds are mad (moore is probably a better player but can't see how he's worth the gamble given his issues)'" gutted - Getting a quality player!

Quote ="Omar Little"Confirmed: www.therhinos.co.uk/news/19127.php? I thinks Hudds are mad (moore is probably a better player but can't see how he's worth the gamble given his issues)'" gutted - Getting a quality player!

Lunt gives something we are missing at the moment. Very good signing.

Those posting here who sit near me will have a wry smile now, as I predicted this and called for it at the Easter Monday game.

Lunt

Daylight

Moore

God knows what Lunts done, be a huge hole to fill and Moore certainly cant fill it.

Really pleased with this. He's a good player Lunt, and he'll add something rather than just filling a hole.

Astute move. McShane has not shown enough class to be considered as first choice and Hood while showing promise is not quite ready yet for a permanent step up. Without Burrow starting at 9 we have been below par and we need him on the pitch for the majority of games. It will be interesting to see if B McD uses a Burrow/Lunt combination at 9 to keep Sinny at 6 or if now we see Mags back to SO. Whatever the line up Lunt adds quality to the squad

I think you’re doing Moore a disservice here. Lunt is a great signing for us (even if only a loan deal) but Moore will fill the hole left more than adequately.

Most of you guys clearly rate Lunt very highly which makes the gamble on Moore even more surprising.

I think this also significantly strengthens our squad compared to having kept Pitts (I note that McDermott mentions that Lunt adds strength in a number of positions)

Wonder who will be going out on loan for us now?

Congrats on a great signing.

Giants must be nuts. Lunt is a great team man with a good attitude and great to watch.

Moore's traits have been well documented elsewhere.

Whilst i welcome the lad i wouldn't be so quick to write off Mcshane who imo hasn't had a very fair crack thus far.
I think Hood will go on loan and possibly Mcshane will follow once RB is fuly fit but like i said i wouldn't want to write any of them off.

There's clearly not much between Hood and McShane in the eyes of the coaching staff given the way they were rotated at the start of the season. Given how much more time McShane has had around the first team squad over the last few years than Hood, that would suggest they aren't convinced by him as a first choice hooker for a SL side.

When Leeds had success with Burrow off the bench at the end of last year, it often involved him coming on for one of the back rowers with Buderus shifting back into a loose forward type role. Lunt is the ideal player for that kind of role, so I wouldn't be surprised to see him starting at hooker with Burrow coming off the bench 20-25 minutes into a game and Lunt moving back to loose.

Rare for Leeds to get a loan player but I like this signing. It gives us plenty of options and allows Mac even more scope to totally bamboozle us with his team selections.

Lunt is a more than decent player with a good attitude...nicely understated here:
"My preferred position is hooker but I am happy playing in the back row as well, whatever the coaching staff want of me. I have trained with the Rhinos yesterday and the players really made me feel welcome. I need to get my head down now and work hard to make the most of this opportunity,"

Agree with the above. Think Lunt is a good loan signing but don't think mcshane and particulary Hood should be written off. Hopefully some loan spells with some first team rugby will assist

Leeds have a got a terrific player, an old-school hooker rather than the additional half-back type of dummy half. Close to the line, you'll not stop him.
Gilder has it spot on re the type of role he'll likely play at Leeds.

Depending on whether bridges have been burnt between Hudds and Lunt, it may not be that much of a gamble. Was he OOC this year? If not, they still get their player back, and have the chance to bring in a player with good potential in Moore. Its almost a win win situation all round

Think Lunt has this season and another 3 contracted to hudds

Correct.

Huddersfield had to move him on to create cap space for Moore. If they decide to retain Moore beyond the end of this season I would expect Lunt to be told he can seek another club, much like Leeds did with Pitts.

Wrong.

Lunt wants to go to oz to be with his brothers + unhappy getting low minutes behind Robbo when he plays + unhappy being 3rd behind Tommy Lee who is a much better defender and has a passing game better suited to the way the Giants play.

If you watched the Giants vs Leeds U20s game you will know exactly what i mean about poor defence.

Clearly moving a high paid player on loan out of our 20s opens up a place and cap space. far more cap space than will be required to sign Moore. Today we have extended the contract of one of our best young forwards.

If you give Lunt 40 mins a game he will give it a go , which is good for Leeds (in attack) and it should help him get a basic contract in oz in 2013. He can then be with his brothers.

Cripesginger, you are in the know!

Lunt did have to be moved to bring in Moore & the fact of the matter is, Lunt did not want to play for Huddersfield. FULL STOP

he's now got 6 months at leeds whilst finalising final details to hopefully go to Oz next year. Good luck to him