I apologise if I missed your post GB, but what was your reply to this...



I'm begining to think he may have a point Bob.....

Diskin has moved to second row before now and even LF but more often than not he's hooking, but my post wasn't to incite yet another Buderus v Diskin debate but to question if Bluey is going with a two hooker rotational system between DB and McShane.

he might have mc shane on the bench & put him on @ scrum half & move sinfield to hooker

Ok William. I'll indulge you, if only to prevent you from taking out your frustrations on vulnerable members of society, as people with your issues so often seem to do.

Here's the problem though. I know you're a coward. I know you're desperate. I know you're hurting. I can make allowances for all these but I can't really make allowances for these [iand [/istupidity.

Clinging to the coat tails of Fishta is very, very stupid. Trying to borrow Fishta's anti coup de grace is very, very, very stupid.

Fishta is a hypocrite. He attempted to offer a narrow definition of hypocrisy in a lame attempt to deflect the evidence already provided against him, namely:

A posting history spent with 2/3 of posts made away from his team's board, whining/trolling about other teams.
A posting history of repeatedly defending Wigan players conduct while attacking those of players from other teams.
Incidences of claiming bans received by Wigan players were unjust and that those of other players were too lenient.
Over 20 pages of foot stamping about Keith Senior despite being able to see the disciplinary report.
Yet no comments made at all about 2 Wigan players found guilty of incidents of the same nature but considered by the panel to be deliberate.
A claim that he didn't see or hear about one of the players (despite playing for his team and having a 6 page thread on the subject on the Wigan board).
A similar claim that he hadn't seen the other incident despite it featuring in a Wigan player, being discussed on RLFANS and the match having been screened on Sky.

On the basis that evidence of hypocrisy was previously provided it wasn't really necessary to throw another bucket of water into the pool when he'd already drowned.

Here's another one for you:

I've not really seen that much of McShane but the times I have seen him he's always been at Hooker - I don't know how he'd get on outside of the hooking roll.

Maybe the likes of rhinoms who follow the academy a little closer than I may be able to say if he has played outside the scrum.

We already know that Sinny can hack the hooking roll as he's proved for England so the one thing Bluey isn't short of is options for that position so it would be interesting to see if young McShane could play at scrum half.

Sorry, I just dont see the point of having Sinfield at Hooker and McShane at Scrum Half. I cannot see any logical reason for doing that. We dont need to try it as we know Sinfield can play hooker if he has to. Why do we need to see McShane at 7 when we know Diskin is out and we could do with another hooker.

I say keep the players in the positions where they usually play and dont be a Ranieri and start tinkering with things too much. Thats just me though

This has to be one of the dumbest posts ever on this board.

:18kdj5uw



Hmmmmm.... That does sound like Fishy was bang on the money Bobby!

Billy owned again.