Had we not reefed the ball at 16-6 we'd have been out of sight by half time.

We went into that match with seven of our first teamers out as well: Jon Wilkin, Maurie, Tony P, Cunningham, Francis Meli, Wheeler (who plays at centre as first choice) and Soliola. [iAll[/i of those would have played had they been fit. Yet we have been at joint second/third for most of the season and the first half of our first game was the last match we played with a full complement of players.

We then added Kyle, Leon and Andrew to the list during the match.

You mean the Leeds team that were missing 7 players this week, 7 players last week and have beaten Warrington, wigan and Saints in the last 10 games?

How is both teams missing a number of players and indication of where the teams are now?

Nope. We would have caught you, just as we did. Had we not made a forward pass, we would have been in the lead within a minute of the second half starting. Or had Paul Wellens not dropped the ball with the tryline wide open to him, we would have been in the lead.

Regardless of the what ifs, I've seen enough of Leeds play over the years to know that you were there for the taking last night. Had Leon not left, we would have taken you. You only beat us by four when we were on our knees.

Our missing players asre better than your misisng players though. History says so.

I was responding to the previous post. Read that and then it will make sense for you.

I wasn't talking about asres though.

No. Leeds were coasting at 16-6 and the reefing turned the tide with two quick tries. That wouldnt have happened, in fact Leeds would have more than likely gone in at 22-6.

Anyhow, it's by the by.

Well it would if i was replying to you rather than TheOtherOne but I wasnt was I?

Its all ifs and buts.

We won. End of.

All that matters ATEOTD.

Yup, now to look forward to KR away and build on the positives of last nigh (If you can look forward to going to such a place)

Rubbish. There wasn't a player on that pitch that even came close to Pryce. Had he not gone off, we lost simple as that.

That lad was immense, and every time he had the ball in his hands the leeds defence just fell open.

Make your mind up. You said it was McClennan who let them back into it by taking Buderus off.

Again that's just your opinion, you really shouldn't post as though your word is final mate


Having watched the game again Pryce had some decent moments but was no where near the standard of Roby and Buderus imo.
Whenever Pryce had good situations it came off the back of work done by Roby and once or twice moore around the ruck and Buderus was doing the same for us to allow Sinfield and co cause the problems we did.

Of course.

Would you go anywhere near Glasser???

Am I alone in thinking Mr Pryce looks like that pepperami thing ?

Best Pryce picture ever:

Very good.

Exact same colour too. Good work.

Not my doing mate, it's the avatar of some bloke called "I grope balls" - I just thought it was really funny.

Anyone got a mr pepperami fancydress outfit and a saints shirt i can borrow ?

Had I said it was final, I would have used the word final.

I gave my opinion and that was it. How else do you want me to put it?

Watch the match again, and not just at runs made. Every single time Pryce got that ball in his hands the Leeds defence split wide open and panicked. Whether that was due to an advantageous view point behind the sticks or something I don't know. But like the Leeds players certainly my but cheeks were clinching every time he had it.

The lad played superby.

don't agree with you. everything pryce did was on the back of great work by roby. buderus got leeds on a roll and kept us going forward at pace and directed us around the park

Gotcha going for rectal reconstructive surgery after his guts fell out at the sound of the final hooter ..

awww . poor delicate little darling xxxx

Re-read the post i quoted.
"Rubbish.There wasn't a player on the pitch that came even close to pryce.Had he not gone off,we lost simple as that."
Your words not mine and that looks more like a statement of fact rather than an opinion.
I won't get into any daft tit tat posts with yer but it comes across like i described it imo.
I've seen enough to form the opinion that Roby was more influential than Pryce and Buderus had a great game for us.