You nearly had me then

Quote ="LFCRhino"I wouldnt trust Facebook if I were you 2 www.dailymotion.com/video/x8ampc ... htmare_fun'" I’m not into adding randomers on Facebook.. I’ve got to either know them from another online community or real life first!

Quote ="LFCRhino"I wouldnt trust Facebook if I were you 2 www.dailymotion.com/video/x8ampc ... htmare_fun'" I’m not into adding randomers on Facebook.. I’ve got to either know them from another online community or real life first!

Yeah Just A Little Bit!...

Me too lad
Too many people add people for games like mafia wars or something and have like 1500 friends when they probably only know 20 of them



Im sick of it coming up on my updates thingy saying so and so is now friends with ching chow-cho

Love It!...

My Pedo ex school mate has the funniest set of friends. He once admitted to a lass who was leading him on that he was going out with a 13 year old online despite been 18 at the time. Every lass on his profile must be 14 / 15 at a push from all over the world.



Worse thing you can have on your profile is your relatives.

Your "friend" needs his head stoving in IMO

I agree about family being on it

Just saying he's going out with a 13 yr old doesn't make him a paedo you know? Weird, but not a paedo.



Yeah, cos vigilante groups are the way to go.

My eight year old cousin was upset today because my sister wouldn’t add her. But then again if my sister added her she’ll have to add the whole of her gymnastic class. I’ve added my cousin and its awkward to say at least!

Older relatives I don’t mind though!


A bit of a touchy subject this is. In Spain its legal to have sex with a 13 year old of which I thinks wrong as will many on here.

Probably best we leave a serious discussion aside as a majority come on here to have a laugh rather than engage in depressing discussions.

Like I said touchy!

I Know a 15 Year Old Girl who's Attractive and goes drinking in Leeds and there is no way you'd put her at that age probably go for about 18/19, I think in this day and age it's harder to tell of ages between people...

Then some lad bangs her and gets to sign the sex offenders register or even worse, go to jail.

Damo, if you have any younger sisters I'd keep them away from your weird 'mate'.

Its very hard and like I’ve said it’s a touchy subject but since its sensible I’ll carry on. If you get with someone because they look old enough and you get on with them then that’s different. But if I got with a 15 year old and only realised later on I’d have to apologise to both her parents and herself because its too young for me as she’ll still be in school.

Now with my mate and the internet. The first time you meet a person online you tend to say ASL which results can be the end of the conversation or the continuation of it. Personally I think my mate got with her because she was 13 rather than the fact that he liked her.

Reminds me of a mates party I went to on the estate and a lass I’ve been dancing with dragged me in front of a camera and said she’s pulled in front of all her mates. Must have been 15 so I did the decent thing and let her carry on with people her own age.

He's not a mate its just that I can't think of another term to describe a school friend. Someone who I went to school with would have been a better term.

Luckily I’ve only got one sister one year younger than myself.

Exactly, The situation is Daft a times, For example He's 18 goes out legally meets a girl who legally shouldn't be there cops off and is then classed as a Sex Offender due to a girl giving him a false age...

He should have IDd her

That Would Be The Last Thing On your Mind!...

Vigilantes should be allowed to deal with paedophiles/nonces etc whatever you want to call them .
Danny .. I assume you don't have a daughter . If you did your view on such a subject might change .

There shouldn't be a sex offenders register.. Only way do deal with them is the registrar of births , deaths , and marriages .

Agreed.

What if the vigilantes get the wrong person?



You've missed the point. I'm saying vigilantes are not the way to go because you could end up attacking an innocent person.

You mean like [url=http://www.salon.com/sex/world/2000/09/26/vigilante/this group of illiterate vigilantes did ?[/url

Leaving the law to groups of self-righteous pub tap room tub-thumpers is a dangerous step to take, I'd hate to be a pediatrician if LS13 came walking down my street.

No they shouldn't. It only takes one person to cry wolf for someones life to end up ruined anyway as with things like that it is very much a case of mud sticks. To start allowing the idiots who take the law into their own hands would only make that worse and give people an "excuse" to do what they wanted to who they wanted in a way.

These things need to be properly investigated and dealt with by the correct people not by Joe Bloggs who wants to take the law into his own hands.

Thankyou. My faith in this board is restored.

It had sunk to new depths.

Make ya mind up Danny lad.

I should have added a rolleyes on the first one.