He probably put a damn site more aggression and impact into his work so he would have been fine.

I was thinking the same myself. Him getting back to fitness seems to have coincided with Leeds turn around in form this year. Having said it "coincided" I don't think there's any coincidence about it, I know it's a cliche but he really leads from the front.

Like your sig, Mr Pinner

A prime example of 'The Golden Rule' in all it's undoubted glory.



You asked a question you didn't know the answer to (always a dangerous policy), the evidence supplied appears unhelpful, not to worry it can be ruled out as inadmissable by Judge Judy.

Always that G1 was a 1/2 wit, now it's proven.

Mea Culpa.

First rule of cross examination. Never ask a question unless you already know the answer. Must admit, you lured me into it with your wording. I know you're usually quote precise so I took a punt. Didn't pay off.

I'll turn it around with my closing speech.

I suspect this is all way above your head so I'd be wary about getting involved if I were you.

Not getting involved, just stating you're a 1/2 wit.

Talking of half wits.



The above was posted before Bailey had played a game this season whereas Burgess had.













Oh, and....




Is there any chance of having that sentence without the missing words?

What has a quote taken from a topic re comments made by Jay Pitts in February got to do with this?

I suggest that you utilise your time more productively and get a life!

Only a half wit wouldn't see the relevance. Oh, that appears to be you.



I'd suggest you utilise your time more effectively and quit being a complete gloit. Unlikely I know but we live in hope.

That's him told.

The creche just keeps getting bigger G1, Era of the Biff and now thebloodbath

Well, if I might be so polite as to assist, it is helpful to consider the knowledge level of the author who chooses to call other, more respected posters, half wits. It's demonstrative of your level of rugby knowledge which, it's plain to see, is small to none. It also shows you have an IQ that is about room temperature.

You put your head above the parapet my friend which was plainly a bad idea as you would obviously be out of your depth in a car park puddle. Still, it's pleasing to see you set low standards but sad that you fail to achieve them.

Respected posters, please.

1.You include someone that posts a cartoon of a backside as respected. That's says it all about you and their opinions.

2. Anyone that uses "probably" is not dealing in fact therefore knows feck all about what they are talking about, whether it is related to rugby or any other topic

You and your kindergarten chums keep on posting.

Read this G1!

This is from your respected poster. Real classy guy!

Eastwoods injured with knee ligament damage. If you have suffered ligament damage you will know how painful it is.

I would also point out that it was gained whilst fronting up for our team. Does he really support the team? or is he a trawl?

I suggest that you pass the brain cell that you share between the three of you back to Era of the Biff for him to reflect on his commments and post a suitable apology.

LOL MEGA FAIL

How did he do it though. Did he trip over his pet lip or not?

A simple yes or no will suffice rather than the heavy period you seem to be having over it.

Oh, and your faux indignation is in poor taste.

Got a third of the way through, fell asleep at my desk and split my lip on the corner.

Whilst at the hospital for stitches Greg was in the next cubicle having reduction surgery on his pet lip.

Yet again you show just what a 1/2 wit you truly are.

1. Trying to disguise your comment as an enquiry instead of admitting you have shown your @rse and apologising, childish!

2. Fake indignation (faux, little boy...had a french lesson yesterday)Must have imagined the knee surgery I had last year.

Any chance of getting a straight answer on my pertinent question?

What those stats don't show is how many yards Sts made all game from both acting half and first receiver. Leeds need to tighten that up a lot IMO. They are consistently defending going backwards off simple plays and need to dominate the collision far more effectively.

That was also what happened this week against KR. My other concern is also why we don't have one high & one low in the tackle.