Ah , " for that to be the exception "

You missed out the " For "

Right I'll read it again now

Back in a mo

If you could get past the little club syndrome you would see im actually suggesting the opposite. That it is a problem that the big 4 monopolise success. Even if some people pretend they dont.

Nope sorry even with the missing ' for ' , this just doesn't make sense

tell me what you are struggling with and ill see if I can dumb it down any further for you.

This I understand , but you don't suggest a solution

Oh and this ' little club syndrome ' ? , go on give us a clue

Away you go , not a clue what you are attempting to say , no doubt like everybody else , but they are pretending they understand , you've heard of ' The Empoers New Clothes ' I assume

The solution is obvious. You dont like the solution though.

the chip on the shoulder carried certain fans of smaller clubs.

Its not a case of a little club syndrome.You have had a decade to see who the smaller clubs are with the doors locked,you have taken every grain handed to you knowing nothing different.People don't like change and being taken out of their comfort zone.You are no different.

'The Empoers New Clothes'? No, I can't say I have ever heard of it, no doubt like everybody else, but they are pretending they understand

So who are we standing in the way of ? , or who do you want us to merge with ?

So wanting and hoping to improve is carrying a shoulder chip ?

We have had far longer than a decade. But you are simply highlighting exactly what I am talking about. Leeds finish 9th and it is a historically bad season, out of their comfort zone, some big changing of the guard. It isnt. Its an isolated bad season that for the vast majority of RL clubs would be a great season, and for all bar another 3, an ok season. Most clubs in RL are striving to hit the worst of Leeds seasons.

Three straw men in one post, great work.

Its a great example of little club syndrome though because if you look back, you will see that I havent, at any stage, criticised Leigh, nor said they shouldnt want to improve.

Ah but I only missed 1 letter , you missed a whole word , see we are both human , even though you think youre somehow better than the rest of , how mistaken you are

Anyway enjoyed our little discussion , but it's bed time for me nighty night

The rest of what?

Our improvement is done for this season.Maybe you should concentrate on your own..

Why is is it racism ? Because you want it to be to suit your argument/comment I can only presume !

Race has zero influence on my post, humour & the fact that both look like they have fallen from the Ugly Tree & hit their faces on every branch on the way down.

Shall we see what Des Drummond has to say about the likelihood of me being a racist next time I meet him Trollin Thunder ?

BrisbaneRhino you are jumping on trolling Thunder bandwagon & both of you are way off *pair of muppets*.

When I go for a coffee with Sir Desmond of Drummond (via a mutual friend) I shall ask him what he thinks. I might be teeing up a nice cycle out into the leafy yonder with him, though he might leave me for dead *he is still in good condition*.

By the way, I do not have to justify myself to grade one clowns like you & furthermore, what race am I ?

Is Eorl Crabtree a male model ? Numb !

Ste you might know or be mates with Des Drummond.
But I doubt he would be too happy if you called him a window licker.
That could be why you have got yourself into bother with a couple or so Rhino fans on here.
Well done on getting promotion but try and think before you post in future hey.

No need to dumb it down SmokeyTA, just check your posts for structure, content & grammatical errors.

You are obviously a man of some intelligence, however when attempting to belittle other forum users you should maybe check that your posts are squeaky clean prior to hitting 'submit'.

Please don't get me wrong, I have picked up some awful habits since I left school, for example, I LOVE to SHOUT, as I have no truck with the office email brigade who believe capitals to be the Devils work, I am also a fan of [i'doing this'[/i to emphasise a particular piece.

Some of your posts have missing words & employ mid sentence words to start a new sentence that should be a continuation utilising a comma.

As I type this post on my phone I am probably guilty of a few grammatical faux pas myself, yet I don't feel the need to jump all over the posts of other forum users because they don't understand my posts.

Atomic doesn't like spaces, others have posts littered with spelling mistakes, but remember, nobody likes the grammar police.

FWIW I can decipher your posts quite easily & you make some salient points. I may not agree wholeheartedly with your argument but it has merit.

chapylad, I believe you miss the point. I have incorrectly & maliciously been called out as a racist by two Leeds fans on this forum & is it is, that is libellous.

My post merely highlighted the fact the both are butt ugly lads, as is Eorl Crabtree & look like they have been chasing parked buses & caught a few.

If two Leeds fans are intent on spinning my post to make it appear something it is not then I can't stop them, but it is still [ilibellous[/i !

Why would I call Des a window licker ? Why would one of yours label everyone who supports Leigh as [ispecial[/i ?

Remember if you will who it was who did that.

So yeah, anyway, Lee Smith looked like he'd put on a bit of weight.

Gassed by a hooker.

As an Equality and Diversity advisor in HM Forces I would like to make the following observations.

The term "Window Licker" is used by an individual to denegrate a person they perceve to be of lower intelligence than themselves. It is not considered a general insult regarding appearance. The term is offensive both to the reciprient and to outside observers (the previous posters and in this case me).
For an example of how poorly this term is looked at please see the error Lego made:
[urlhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/33079474/lego-apologises-for-window-licker-toy[/url

The same can be said for the term "Mong" - again a derogatory term to belittle intelligence; HOWEVER, you expanded the term to "Mongrel". You were referring to Segyaro and have also referenced Albert Kelly. In this sense the term "Mongrel" can be interpreted as a racist remark as both individuals are of aboriginal descent. In the ugly history of racism, “mongrel” has been used to demean couples of different ethnicities and children of mixed race. The use of mongrel also invokes another nasty word, miscegenation, which is a derogatory term for couples of mixed race who marry and have kids.

If you were in front of me accused of casual racisim and discrimination toward percieved intelligence I would uphold the case and I would seek to be following a path of suitable resolution.

Please refrain from using offensive language and terminology on our board.

put the shovel down ste....you have gone deep enough.

Completely the way I saw it, the term mongrel used to describe there racial heritage, not to say they are ugly, pure racism and he knows it, using the I've got a black friend argument as an excuse, would not be so back if he just admitted the comments were wrong and just apologies

Only libelous if it's false.

Shall we await your rebuttal of vsewo's post before deciding that?