He might miss that - he's probably playing World of Warhammer or something.

Looks like it

Oi! Less of it, please.

He has a hard on for Cunningham, that's all. So any time and every time he appears on TV, he jumps on the Saints board and jerks off about him.

That wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.

McGouldrick got a one match ban, for a kick that did no damage.

For a deliberate kick that did no damage.

Note the key word...

Watch the Senior kick on the SL show when they are interviewing Tompkins, shows it from a from a differing angle from the original BBC footage I believe, Seniors kick is very deliberate IMHO as I said from the outset.

Can you tell if its deliberate or not? Can you read Keith's mind? Can you read Ryan's mind?

YES!

Your pants are on fire.

Get 20p.......






























































And Phone someone who gives a[size=200 fook![/size

Can you read my mind right now?

Yes, you're thinking why am I typing this ridiculous dribble when I could be entertaining the wife!
Was that anywhere close??

Your point been? You responded to my post so you must give a what is the word you used? "fook" I bleieve. Are you in need of 20p, does that get you to use the toilet regularly?(You did show me your ass did you not?) Are the toilets that expensive in Leeds, that really is a rip off. You should come live down here the toilets are free to use, we even provide toilet paper.

Fortunately your opinion counts for nothing as I'm sure I saw Keefs name on the teamsheet,albeit on the bench, last Friday. It's time you and Fishta moved on. The RFL have deliberated and adjudicated!

Being.

Can the RFL?



Well, that's not consistent with the Lee Smith decision.

Anyone got links to vids of either the old Tomkins kick-out or the one from Sunday?

PLEASE let these school holidays finish, reduce the amount of garbage we have to wade through to find the decent posters.

When you guys leave school and get jobs, maybe you'll understand that we can't sit at a computer all day posting abusive lies.

Is this a particular bug-bear of yours? Watch it though as Fishta is the self-appointed Chief of the grammar police - even though he himself occassionally screws up!

Has a wizzard has cast a spell on you on level 87 so you're locked out of your pc games for a bit?

Nice that that gives you time to spend a bit more time lamely trolling other boards rather than posting on the Wigan board - you know, Wigan: the team you purport to follow.

However, it might be an idea to use the time to change your avtar. Whilst it might be funny to adolescent nerds with an inferiority complex and a deep wonder of what it must be like to kiss a girl, it does make some of your accusations such as those above look more than a little ironic.

Hmm... I'm far from perfect, but at least I can spell people's usernames correctly.



It's Wizard, it should be PC, it should be avatar, and it should be iconic.

Nice to know I've got a fan so obsessed (s)he spends so much time reading my other posts.

The irony is not lost on me.

If you're not a child, stop acting like one. Simple, really.

If you're keen to throw insults at gamers, maybe you'd like to nip over to the gaming thread and post your abuse to everyone there instead of constantly dragging this thread off topic?

Just a suggestion, like.

The other 'gamers' might well be nerds but they don't spend their RLFANS life hypocritically drifting from one rival club's board to another to indulge in puerile sh[ii[/it stirring.

It takes only a few seconds to look at your posting history to see that you do however. Truly pathetic, and an embarrassment to a proud club like Wigan that you should seek to associate yourself with it (albeit without spending too much time reading or posting on their board or indeed watching their matches).

Your agenda on here is the same as on any other thread on Southstander; your favourite board on RLFANS (the Saints one); or any of the other club's boards you infest - simply to hypocritically sh[ii[/it stir so please spare me the lecture on staying on topic, your double standards are quite clear enough already.

You know, I think you actually believe that.

You like throwing that "hypocritically" word around a lot. It really is a shame you clearly don't know what it means.

Let me break it down for you. You say I am a hypocrite. To be a hypocrite I would need to have stated something to contradict my opinion that Senior should have faced a ban, for example, that another player who had done something similar SHOULDN'T have had a ban.

Point out where I do this and you may have a point. Fail to do so, AS YOU WILL because I haven't, and you are shown up to be the childish infantile abusive liar that you are.

To save you the time, don't bother, because it isn't there.

Whilst we're on about bans and punishment being applied fairly, you have several times defeated the naughty word filter to post inappropriate language. You have broken 4 other rules in the AUP. A sure sign of desperation, and you deserve a ban. It would be inconsistent not to warn or ban you for these actions.

What did I tell you about the Chief of the grammar police!







Well Fista (oops!) here's one you made earlier -:

"It does seem to me that Saints fans struggle to string together coherent discussions. Usually they resort to thread derailment (by, say, posting a picture that has no bearing on the thread), insults (which is the norm) or statements that make no sense (e.g. "you have an obbsession with cunningham, therefore your wrong"icon_wink.gif, most of which seem to come out with terrible spelling and grammar" .

KAPOW! Now do one - Sadsack!