Christ you do talk some bo||ocks Smokey.

Warrington were adrift, rudderless, simply making the playoffs was enough for them.

This isn't about history, it's about where clubs are now and where they can get to. Leigh can get to the very top, (as Warrington have) but it will take a long time of consistent investment and improvement. There is no magic bullet solution, as Koukash has found. Leigh have first to make themselves a consistent mid-table side whilst building/expanding the infrastructure and reach of the club. As Warrington did. Then they can attempt the huge step from mid-table to the top. But you can't skip out that middle step, it just won't work. As Koukash has comprehensively proved.

Me too, if it's 6-0 to Leyth.

You're just boosting numbers by including Leeds, Wigan and Saints.

Before Simon Moran took over at Warrington they went over half a century with just 1 Challenge Cup and 0 league titles to their name, that's not a constant 'Big Club' and most of their success was in a certain period of late 40's-mid 50's, not unlike Bradford with their mid 90's-mid 00's. Before to his investment started to pay off with the Cup wins of 2009, 2010 and 2012 they had won less Challenge Cups than Hudds and the same amount as Wakey and Halifax. And for his ownership it's still taken them over a decade and counting to clinch the main prize and that's the point being made by others regarding that it takes time.

You take it personally when facts disprove whatever narrative you are trying to pretend is the truth now.

Leigh are in a completely different position to Warrington, Leigh have spent 1 season in the top flight in the professional era, Warrington have never spent a season out of it.

Where you wish to downplay Warrington as 'adrift, rudderless, simply making the playoffs was enough for them' Most clubs are striving for that. Leigh are far far below that. The fact is, bar the big 4, 'adrift, rudderless, and simply making the playoffs' is historically good, if Leigh's next ten years are as good as Wire's decade pre 2004 and the move the Halliwell Jones, it will by a long long way their best period of success in my life-time.

Koukash hasnt comprehensively proved anything other than his own inability to actually put in place any sort of plan. But im not arguing Leigh can make that huge step to the top without being a mid-table side first. Im arguing that they can't do it either way. It very very rarely happens for any club in any circumstance and when it does, it usually a very brief time.

And ?

im not boosting anything by Including Leeds, Wigan and Saints. It would be ThePrinter level of nonsense for me to count the trophies won by a big 4 of Leeds, Wigan, Saints, and Wire, that didnt include Wigan, leeds and Saints.

Simon Moran has been part of Warrington for a fair old time now, the majority of the pro-era, it makes no sense to take out just because it suits you. Its like about 10% of the entire games existence you are removing for no discernible reason.

And nothing.

Its a self-contained argument backed up by facts and evidence. Has that confused you?

It's a very nicely put together history lesson , but history is in the past , you make your own future

And history is filled with the failings of fools who are certain they were the exception, and not the rule. They werent.

No, Him made a relevant point about Warrington and the investment they've made over the last decade to get up to the likes of Leeds, Saints and Wigan and you tried to make out as if Warrington had been at their level throughout the games history by coming up with stuff such as those 4 teams have won 16 of the 20 GF's played when we know Wire haven't won any of them and nearly half of their 8 Challenge Cups came after they had Moran's money.

Moran became owner of Warrington in 2003. How many of the 2 big trophies did they win in the previous 50 years and what years were they?

We might be the exception , most likely we won't be , but that's the beauty of sport , nobody knows , even you

And if we're not , why do you even care ? , go on , tell us we're stopping somebody else from being the exception , some mythical club that our existence is holding back

Well, us little folk had better give up then. Thanks for the heads-up smokey.

Don't you start pointing out facts , you know that isn't allowed

Until the rule changes.Take the norm away and there are no exceptions,no safeguards.You have yet to experience that.

No, my point was that what Warrington had to do when Moran took them over to make that jump, in as so much as it existed at all, was far far far less than pretty much any other club had to.

This doesnt make sense as a sentence never mind an argument.

Now you know how the rest of us feel trying to decipher your garbled rubbish

There is no reason for it to be necessary that to be the exception. There is no reason that this structure we have (in all senses of the word) has to be that way. It isnt the beauty of sport, the beauty of sport would be if there was a realistic chance of the next couple of years Leigh packing out houses and being successful. Like the NRL where as of this year every club bar the new Gold Coast club will have appeared in a GF.

Great wit! You put a laughing face on it so we know it was funny.

Very true...

Do you want to re post this in English ?

I dont think it is possible for me to simplify it any further for you.

" There is no reason for it to be necessary that to be the exception "

Brilliant , just what are you suggesting this means ?

Can anybody explain this to me ?

There is no reason for it it to be necessary for that to be the exception (the exception as previously stated being smaller clubs success)

This is the point in Starbugs postings where he either lies or pretends to be stupid. (there is no exception to this rule)

So the top four pack their houses out and forget whats below them.You have had a wake up call in reality this season,one you haven't seen for many a year and now you compare the system to NRL.You really could have done with a feeder club this season.