Confused how thats happened seen as I have given you the right amount on my database and table. I apologise

I can't see last weeks predictions thread, so I can't verify my pathetic score

Quote ="leicester_rhino"I can't see last weeks predictions thread, so I can't verify my pathetic score'" Not your concern old luv, someone has selflessly taken it upon themselves to perform that function for every entrant and every entry this season. He tells me that you scored [size=2001[/size (One) this week. If you'd like a third opinion the original thread is here viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460240&start=15

Quote ="leicester_rhino"I can't see last weeks predictions thread, so I can't verify my pathetic score'" Not your concern old luv, someone has selflessly taken it upon themselves to perform that function for every entrant and every entry this season. He tells me that you scored [size=2001[/size (One) this week. If you'd like a third opinion the original thread is here viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460240&start=15

This week's remaining Issue highlighted in =#FF0000red

While we await the official update, this week's Top Tipsters were Rhino46, rhinochris, rotherhamrhino and Sarahgrhino all with 8. Depending on the outcome of the official verdict on the validity of two posts (or parts thereof) it's entirely possibly that we will emerge with a new stand-alone leader. Discussed here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=30 and here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=45 Provisional Polesitter - FoxyRhino with 108.

While we await the official update, this week's Top Tipsters were Rhino46, rhinochris, rotherhamrhino and Sarahgrhino all with 8. Depending on the outcome of the official verdict on the validity of two posts (or parts thereof) it's entirely possibly that we will emerge with a new stand-alone leader. Discussed here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=30 and here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=45 Provisional Polesitter - FoxyRhino with 108.

Quote ="tvoc"While we await the official update, this week's Top Tipsters were Rhino46, rhinochris, rotherhamrhino and Sarahgrhino all with 8. Depending on the outcome of the official verdict on the validity of two posts (or parts thereof) it's entirely possibly that we will emerge with a new stand-alone leader. Discussed here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=30 and here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=45 Provisional Polesitter - FoxyRhino with 108.'" Quote ="FoxyRhino"Sponsor #13 Hull by 20 Saints by 24 Huddersfield by 16 Wigan by 14 Crusaders by 10 Castleford by 8 Warrington by 12'" 109? FoxyRhino was on 103 before this week and got six points this week

Quote ="tvoc"While we await the official update, this week's Top Tipsters were Rhino46, rhinochris, rotherhamrhino and Sarahgrhino all with 8. Depending on the outcome of the official verdict on the validity of two posts (or parts thereof) it's entirely possibly that we will emerge with a new stand-alone leader. Discussed here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=30 and here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=45 Provisional Polesitter - FoxyRhino with 108.'" Quote ="FoxyRhino"Sponsor #13 Hull by 20 Saints by 24 Huddersfield by 16 Wigan by 14 Crusaders by 10 Castleford by 8 Warrington by 12'" 109? FoxyRhino was on 103 before this week and got six points this week

Yup 109.

It was a mis-type onto this thread. Panic over.

That's why you're the boss.

__________

I think you've set a dangerous precedent with this week's scoring though.

Won't you now be powerless to impose any penalty on a future similar occurrence?

And what if a poster goes on to make the play-offs by virtue of the points awarded from games already completed at the time of an edit?

As the sole trustee of the competition's integrity I think it's something you should consider carefully.

Is it equitable for you to penalise a late (but still in-gametime) entry when allowing an edited entry after the very same games have completed to stand?

Excuse me Mr. Tvoc sir, how dare you leave our club!

It was fun while it lasted, we had some great times together (and shared some pain) but we all change and it's probably time for me to move on and gather some new experiences. I'll never forget you though and I hope we can still be friends.

Besides I'm not sure I'd want to belong to any club that would allow me as a member.

I'll probably see you next week.

As a long time player of this tipping/prediction game I can only agree with the above, no points should be given for posting a prediction/editing a prediction after a game has kicked off (just ask any bookie!)

if people need to add information then seperate posts can easily be made, any edit raises suspicions which we dont want in our game

Anyone spot any errors this week? I'm sure it'll be littered with them

Not only will there be no errors this week (at least no deliberate ones) but each entrant will find his/her/it's name spelled correctly.

I'll say one thing it's not quite as easy as it looks.

I expect Frosties will be all over it like a rash. I know I would be if I were him. Payback time.

I've organised a multi-entrant prediction competition elsewhere and not making mistakes takes a lot of concentration (and a good spreadsheet construction).

=#FF0000This week's issue/s highlighted in red:

I need to get some form going or this famous quote will be used about me !!!

I can see you're still struggling with this one - it should be Harlequins RL by 17

What a shocker this week 2 from 7 and I weren't alone.

Salford's first win at Odsal in the SL Era, Celtic/Crusaders first win at Les Catalans, Catleford's first home win V Wakefield in 7 attempts dating back to 2002, Warrington actually managing to beat a top team this season and Hull turning the form book on it's head.

Love this season's SL.

Oh and this week's Top Tipster with 7 is ... Sibbs Rhinos (another upset

)

Me, you and who else? Whoever it is, we should make them feel welcome!

Our little private members club this week consists of: rhinos69, Old Feller, Hopie,
LFCRhino, tvoc, Glenn Quagmire and Bernadette Gill.

deanos rhinos application was rejected unfortunately as he didn't reach the required standard.

May I add I've missed a couple of weeks so my languishing league place can be blamed on this

At least im in good(bad) company



This applies to me again this week

For a couple of weeks read 5 (Wk's 6, 14, 20, 21,22) and ignoring the short week 1, then averaging your points won over the 17 week's you remembered to enter, it has probably cost you between 25 and 26 points, which would have had you on the edge of the play-offs.




Bad mainly, especially that Bernadette geezer, he's a wrong 'un.

Really?

In my imagination ... yes, really.