I'm quite sure you know full well some (if not all) of the reasons why it's in the best interests of the club to get rid of him and for both parties to finally move on.

Feel free to keep spinning it as Hardaker being the architect of the move.

Tomkins went for 700k and his salary was around 500k per year (around $1 mill)
Given that you would say Hardaker is a steal!

Interesting. If that is the case, then best for all parties to move on. And credit to the club I guess.

I can assure you you are wrong here. If you find out the reason, you will, like anyone else understand fully. Might not be dissapointment, but you will still understand.

Of course they do. There is a reason, the club have understood that, and are losing out because of it. The club have tried all they can to persuade different. They deserve nothing but credit for backing him.

Who's the player we wanted? Surely you can reveal that seeing as the move didn't come off.

I always get my 3's and 7's confused, except when Robbie and Kallum are standing next to each other...

Don't know why you feel the need to be so secretive Gotcha - you're not doing anyone any favours

Edited - I'll pm you gotcha.

Can this reason in any way explain why some players have lost confidence and if so is that not just another off field problem the coach has had to cope with?

Nothing to do with others.

Although the other player who asked to end his contract could be attributed to that.

There was always going to be a day of reckoning between the club and the player.

You know that as well.

I'm surprised it's taken this long.

The club didn't mess about this long in the past. Just ask Bobbie Goulding.

Correct, and no NRL club will fork out £300k for him.

And which SL club would fork out the same?

It would have to be a RU club with money to burn.

There'll be no financial killing made like when Harris was sold to Welsh RU.

Hang on is this for next season or is he requesting to go asap?

Dont talk rubbish

If the current MofS cant get a gig in the NRL then SL might as well pack in all together
Hardaker should choose wisely though, he should go to a team that actually needs him or could end up not getting a fair crack like Burgess at the Roosters

If there are genuinely personal reasons for him to go to aus, it surely can't benefit him to stay longer than he has to? And if this is the case, do we i) not play him when fit as his hearts not in it, or ii) play him and hope he plays well so his value doesn't drop?

£300k is only the asking price remember. If an NRL club are interested, they would probably pay £100-£200k fee, then recoup some of this by paying slightly less in wages, over a few years, than if he were a free agent.

Yeah I'm sure they will all be queuing up. Not every day you get to pick up a player from the bottom placed Super League team. Whatever way you look at it, £300k would be a gamble for any team, never mind an NRL side.

You mean like what Canterbury paid Leeds for homesick Greg Eastwood?

Translation: NOTHING

they wanted hurrell from NZ warriors. odd given he's as bad off the field

[url=http://s206.photobucket.com/user/bagadog/media/zakk.jpg.html[/url

Well Salford R D won't be signing him. Tim Sheens has said, We won't be signing any idiots and Scallywags

If its him then I imagine Hardaker himself blocked that move
If you want to establish yourself as an NRL fullback then why on earth would you go to a club where you would have to compete with RTS long term

I believe he's off to Canberra

Looks like Wighton got the message and finally managed a game without a major screwup.

Hodgson and Whitehead are going really well for the Raiders so they know the value there is in SL if the player/s involved knuckle down.

That was the rumour. And then Wighton had his best game of the season! Wighton's actually a pretty similar player to Zak.