Hmm.all square at HT.nothing in it.Wigan uping their game in a meaningful fixture,Who would have guessed it?

SL rabble at its best tonight.another nail in the coffin of this gash system.but it does put more value on a win in saturdays game.

Just emphasises the degree of -taking that's gone on during the regular season by Warrington, Leeds and Wigan.

I'm pleased Wigan have won because it renders a degree of meaningfulness to the Warrington/Leeds game on Saturday.

I think Warrington and Leeds would prefer to avoid Saints at home next week.

I trust the cat is doing well?


As far as I can work out, the only team you cannot play next week should you lose is Hull KR. You would have the highest placed of St Helens/Hull FC/Catalans.

I trust you will understand when i say after the last few years none of us leeds fans worry about who we play to get to OT.others should worry about avoiding us!

Well played by the way.a real lesson handed out to the pretenders.

I did say after last weeks game and during the week that you shouldn't rule Wigan out as they don't/won't concede many.

So Saturday is now
Win and get clubcall
Lose and probably get Saints

And either way I'm not fussed, we won't let clubcall effect us even though so many are worried by it.
And sorry but had Leeds not won it from 5th no one would even give Saints a hope, and as Old Trafford has shown over the years......Saints can't match Leeds.

Would be interesting if we did get clubcall and the top 4 stay as it is.
Would we pick Wigan as the lowest placed team?
Would rather we avoid Saints until OT.
Dark horses at 12/1 .

Too many.

Covered all your bases there haven't you?



Still, you and Gotcha are ad idem.

We (or Wire) can't pick Wigan. They will get whoever doesn't get picked at the DW......providing Wigan Athletic let them play there.

Classic Gotcha

"The most important thing to remember when you find yourself walking through hell ...... is to keep walking"

If it were 15 minutes then he would have been active in a tackle or a carry every 37 seconds. In your opinion this qualifies as a disgrace does it?

who mentioned tackles. 3 carries is a disgrace

Once again keyboard is tapped and opinion formed before any form of reasoning is engaged.

Oh good, another thread hijacked by team of Kirke. Could we not just keep it all on one thread

How many minutes did he play?

he won't answer. he won't engage reason

You will recall that it was I who had asked you this question because I suspect you do not know the answer. I do not know for sure how many minutes Kirke played either (I would guess around 20) but that is why I have not jumped in with judgemental comments like you and your follower Tad chose to do.

his follower? i wouldn,t follow him down the street

Oh, I see. If you didn't know how many minutes how did you arrive at his average tackles per minute stat on the other thread?

I guess you just made it up then.

The number of minutes came from Tad who suggested 15. My point was made to challenge his unfair comment.
ie: that you have to include the tackles plus carries to judge a players active involvement. Like I said if it were 15 minutes then Kirke would have been physically active in play every 37.5 seconds which made Tad's comments harsh to say the least. He wasn't on for much longer than this IMO.

Regardless of how many minutes he was on 15-20 minutes, that would give Leeds at least 7 sets, given he was fresh on the park he should have been shouldering some of the workload, how many hit ups do you think Peacock or Kylie would have done in 7 sets?

Bailey starts at 13, Singleton on bench, Achurch and Clarkson out.