Isn't it just squad number order?

I doubt Burrow is playing centre.

Merry xmas Gotcha.

...Read the original post more carefully....namely the positions "confirmed"

Might be more inclined to take the 100 mile journey though if Burrow does play centre ...could be a good xmas chortle in the spirit of the festive season. Delaney playing there is almost as funny.

The only positions confirmed are Sinfield at six and Ablett at 13 with Sinfield playing halback with Rob Burrow. Unless I have missed something else that people are reading?

I have not seen anything saying Webb will be the starting fullback. Of course he might well and possibly will be, just not seen it confirmed that BJB won't be fullback.

Quite. I mean, with the massive contribution Buderus has made to our success over the last 10 years he's entitled to rest on his laurels a little. His commitment can't be question. No, really.

Also it doesn't say anywhere that Cross will be playing Prop so I'm hoping to see him have a good run out on the wing.

Talk about pedantic Gotcha!! I don't think nantwichexile's post deserved that level of questioning even by your usual standards.



Nantwichexile was clearly just saying that from this squad, the general consensus would be Mac has a preference for Sinfield (rather than Webb) at 6. Thus the observation it could happen this way in SL also, meaning BJB would be missing out on playing an extended period at FB. Key words are PROBABLY and EXTENDED PERIOD AT FB.

Nowhere does Nantwichexile say BJB won't be playing FB this game, nor that Webb will be. Just simply that should Mac's preference for Sinfield at 6 continue into SL, BJB would PROBABLY miss out on an extended period at FB.

Perfectly legitimate comment.

Excuse me, but I really don't have time for silly arguments.

Nantwichexile, whom I have no problem with whatsover posted that from the squad list it confirmed that BJB would have to wait for his overdue run out.

I asked a simple question "Is this not just squad number order"? Where is the pedantic or unreasonable level of questioning?

But thank you for confirming something else for me about you, that I was just guessing at previously.

Expediting new year resolutions a tad early this year aren't you?

You PHIL this forum with silly arguments on a DALY basis.

Get over yourself.

Utter bo[ill[/iocks and you know it is.

Firstly.... NOBODY has time to post on a forum, but not time to "argue". There's no necessity to comment on here at all. Nobody is counting how many times a day you post. If you've got time to write the post, then you've got time to argue. If you haven't got time to [whatever just don't come on here and post at all. This is a leisure activity, not a mandatory requirement. Starting a post by effectively saying, "I haven't got time to post" is just a stupid notion.

Secondly.... Nantwichexile never EVER said it was CONFIRMED that BJB would [etc as you've just stated. Luckily, we have the ability to re-read what Nantwichexile actually put, thus proving you're talking your usual bo[ill[/iocks.

Nantwichexile simply said...

Which is a totally legitimate statement, because if Mac has a preference for playing Sinnie at 6, then it does look like BJB will have to wait a little longer for his overdue extended run at FB.

Your pedantic and unreasonable level of questioning comes not in your "is that the squad no. order" post, but in the post afterwards. You know that's pedantic. That's the definition of pedantic. "It doesn't specifically say that Webb will be playing FB? What's making you assume he is?"

Basically what happened is you didn't read my original post properly, which NE then picked you up on, but instead of saying... "Oops you're right! Sorry I didn't read that properly!" you went down the route of creating a completely bo[ill[/iocks argument to try and justify your completely bo[ill[/iocks post.

Anyway, seen as you "don't have time" we can both just leave it at that.

Really?

A quick run through your post history may give a very different point of view.

Gotcha - the poster with more holes than swiss cheese.

See BB... what he's doing now is "cleverly" (and I use the term loosely!) not replying, because several of us have pointed out the obvious flaw in replying to a post you're claiming to not have time to reply to.

Genius!

The ground's like bell metal here. Must be a good chance of a cancellation?

Actually Remarkable Rhinos or should I say .....................



I actually have Bloodbath on ignore because he's borning, repetative, and frankly irrelevant.

With you I just think you are a bit of a pr1ck so I thought better of responding, until you obviously wanted me to clarify by the post above.

HTH for future though.

Excellent. My work here is done...

As you were.

Hope not!

Did you stamp your feet whilst typing that?

Have a word.......

Funny you should ask, I've just had an email from a friend, who knows someone involved on the hospitality side of things at HQ.

They have been told that there is a strong chance of a cancellation, and, if that happens, then the game will be moved to Wed 29 at 7.30pm.

Aw hope not. Part of the tradition of Boxing Day now. The Mrs. is working on Wednesday night too if that's the case.

Sick to death of this weather now and no doubt the worst is yet to come in Jan/Feb.

thought you'd have gone to bradford stuck up diskins .
don't think buderus was to blame for all the injuries last year do you? Really?

I notice she gets a little sensitive when anyone dares critique her darling Buderus. Bless.

Diskin wasn't to blame for Buderus injury in 2009, but he and us never looked back afterwards that year.

Lessons were not learned.

Whats this quotes in quotes in quotes thing? It's remarkable technology these days.

Jeez, anyone would think you was Nantwichexile

Hopefully the cold snap will put an end to what is a complete and utter waste of time and money.

All this chat as if the game had some gravitas - unreal!!

It does. It's the only thing that'll motivate me to get my tubby ass off the sofa and do "the boxing day social"

Would be gutted if it's called off, I love the Boxing Day fixture and with virtually a full squad announced I was/am really looking forward to it.

sky think it is important as they have featured 3 signings on Sky sports news and the possible boxingday fixture



News filler??