My view, and one I expressed at the time, was that accolades such as "best", "greatest" etc shouldn't be bestowed upon a team until they've been earned.

I thought at the start of the season that the squad was stronger than in 2009. Which words I used to describe that apparent strength could be interpreted differently by each individual.

What results are achieved on the pitch doesn't change the fact that the squad was stronger or indeed weaker, just that certain factors meant we didn't achieve as much, as has already been aluded to.

I can live with those statements. What I took issue with were descriptions of the squad as being the "best" and so on.

In which case the person who appear to be most at odds with (and allegedly they are an actual carbon based life-form, which isn't necessarily always the case on here) is a Mr G. Hetherington.

I trust you'll be expressing your views with him directly at your earliest opportunity.

Oi Hetherington, NOOOOOOOOOOO.

All you need is ignorance and confidence and the success is sure. Mark Twain

We had cigars and brandy after our sumptuous dinner tonight and I brought this up.

Then we top and tailed Kath.

Too much information.

How am I supposed to sleep now after reading that.

You dressed her up as Fred Astair? Kinky!

I bet you both had the same view.