yes please dont group us with the inbreds of cas.

now we know your a codite but even you must have the brain power to read the 1st post on this thread which sums up last night

Did you understand that or would you like a drawing?

Really cant be bothered getting into an argument with another childish loiner.

You really do not possess the mental capacity to realise that if you post inflammatory or contentious post on an opponent’s board you are not going to get a reasoned and ‘intelligent’ response?

No you dim wit you are going to provoke a retort of an equally obtuse nature?

There is a certain irony in a Hullian (or whatever you half breeds like to refer to yourselves as) in requesting an intelligent reply don’t you think.

Now I would suggest you go have a lay down – you have obviously blown your Giro by now and there is really not much more that your pathetic ramblings can add to this debate.

Jog on.

[uTRANSLATION [/u– I do not posses the intellectual skills to debate with a child.

No i just dont want to get into an argument that thinks calling somone inbred because they have a smaller population size is witty. If you want to get into petty arguments allday and derail threads thats your shout i have better things to do with my time.

No wonder this forum has such a bad reputation, your just spoiling it for the rest of your supporters.

Please show us the ‘on topic’ contribution you have made to this thread?

Otherwise grab yourself a dictionary and look up the word ‘hypocrite’.

Only pointing out that i would rather not be grouped with cas, rather like you pointed out that you didnt want to be grouped with Leeds.

don't really think you would want to compare unemployment statistics between hull and Leeds!


Also I would suggest my education is far superior to yours (unless you went to oxford?) so therefore if it's intelectual debate you want, you could do a lot worse!

Alright didnt mean to upset you

If its makes you feel better i dont lump you in with the likes of l16 rhino.

You mean the present one is worse than the one we beat at a canter last season ?

If you went to Oxford University you would know it's Oxford, not oxford . Sleeping rough in the bus station there once doesn't get you an education.

So, it's a good job that he was spot on and that everything was as it should be and it was a try then ....

I've got such a raging clue right now, I almost squirted clue juice all over Joe.

The point being we seem to throw far more forward passes these days generally, including the ones that we DO get away with and the ones that we get caught by.

To bring the discussion back on track.

Whatever you think of Ganson, Leeds did make a rod for their own back on numerous occasions. You cannot blame a referee for back-chat penalties and you cannot blame a referee for niggly ball ripping. Discipline has been a key issue all season but of course, Ganson is an easy target.

As for Ganson, I'm sure he likes to think that the reason he didn't get finals a few years ago was because he's a St Helens fan. I'd rather like to think that he is, purely and simply, not good enough to be trusted with big games.

Whenever there is some form of refereeing controversy, Steve Ganson is invariably involved to the point where it is too common to just be coincidence. Some people of course will praise his "no nonsense" approach but you can't take that approach if some of your decisions are just a complete nonsense.

Good performance from Ganson last night IMO.

Good one.

Bluey said that if we had lost, it would have been the fourth in a row with referee Ganson.

Sinfield said that they all watch other games and we dont seen to get the same decisions that other teams get. Last night proved it.

Both points, if I was Stuart Cummings I would be looking into on Monday morning and if proved wrong then I would haul Bluey and Sinfield in for a telling off. If it is proved that Bluey and Sinfield are correct in their statements then Ganson needs to be hauled in for his explanation

If that is the case, and as all Catalans home games have the video ref, why didnt he view the kick off restart when Lee Smith was clearly fouled?

Back to the original posting - a good one too.

Seniors penalty for the high shot was actually given by the touch judge.

It was hard for Webb to get up with Obsts arm around his back.

I agree with the Ablett being dumped into touch thing. Sinfield actually spoke to Ganson when we were penalised saying well they just did it. Incidently, did Ablet say "Taxi for Ganson!" to incue the penalty for back chat?

Ablett actually moved out of the way, to allow Brad Drew a clear run to bounce off Peacock. Again, why not use the technology?

Agreed with their try that was a knock on. It was even more cringeworthy when Phil Clarke tried to justify it by saying did it bounce off Ryan Halls Head!

In short, as I have said before, Stuart Cummings needs to look at this on Monday morning. Why did Ganson clearly say to a Wakey player "Do that again and I will penalise you!" He obviously didnt give Leeds the same chance. Had this been a Stains game, they would have all been in the refs face so credit to the boys here for not getting into the refs face and letting the captain do his job and ask the questions one to one. the final penalty count was about 12-5 but it was 11 - 1 when Webb was sin binned. We are not the worst team in Super League with regard to discipline all that is required is even handed refereeing.

and finally...... Stevo was slating Leeds and almost creaming his pants at the thought of us getting beaten. Not to worry Stevo, keep taking the tablets and keep dreaming of 1973!

You are wasting your time here mate, they only use examples that fit their so called neutral argument. Anything else that happens is clearly sour grapes from us 'Whinos'

Sorry about that - obviously a new rule change that I am oblivious to. The rule being If it would benefit Leeds dont go to the video referee - if it might cost Leeds the game have a look just for good measure. Although last night might have been seen as "Lets jst rub the Wakey noses in it again!"

I thought last night I was watching a World War Two documentary - There was this guy kept waving two fingers in the air. As we finished with twelve men perhaps we could quote "Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few!"

Webb was back on by the end wasnt he?

Erm, only just